Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alexander, I update the ticket to reflect what I think it's the basic set of tools. Mainly: * Create a FlexJS Project * Add a FlexJS SDK * Compile files in the project with the selected SDK * Get the output in some selected folder * Have a "Run App" for this kind of app that would let the deve

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-25 Thread Alexander Doroshko
I could file such a request myself :) I'd appreciate if somebody could add detailed instructions on what needs to be done at IDE side. On 25.11.2013 15:15, Carlos Rovira wrote: Ok! :) just created it: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116986 Please feel free to add, modify with whate

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Ok! :) just created it: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-116986 Please feel free to add, modify with whatever info you guys need to make it a valid feature request. Thanks Alexander! Carlos 2013/11/25 Alexander Doroshko > I wrote "just file a feature request", not "I've just filed

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-25 Thread Alexander Doroshko
I wrote "just file a feature request", not "I've just filed feature request" :) On 25.11.2013 14:15, Carlos Rovira wrote: Thanks to you Alexander, If IntelliJ will support FlexJS, It will bring many people to the new technology and things would evolve more quickly. If you need some help in try

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-25 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks to you Alexander, If IntelliJ will support FlexJS, It will bring many people to the new technology and things would evolve more quickly. If you need some help in trying/testing, let me know to help you. Please, could you share the permalink to the feature request you filled? Thanks, Carl

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-25 Thread Alexander Doroshko
On 21.11.2013 1:10, Alex Harui wrote: I keep hoping the IntelliJ folks would jump in. Sure, just file a feature request at http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/IDEA with instructions what we need to do. Alexander

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Well, we keep the honorary major version 4 and do the actual numbering > with the minor version and the build number. We start with 4.0.1 for > alpha 1 and work our way up to 4.1.0 for the first release. > > I like this but I would prefer it

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-20 Thread Erik de Bruin
Well, we keep the honorary major version 4 and do the actual numbering with the minor version and the build number. We start with 4.0.1 for alpha 1 and work our way up to 4.1.0 for the first release. EdB On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/20/13 12:43 PM, "OmPrakash

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/20/13 12:43 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, >> >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay f

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, > >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each > >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advan

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-19 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advantage, besides >being always up to date, is that this way the

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
>>They are actually overrides of the defaults set in the Configuration >>class and it's super classes. Nothing special, nothing dynamic ;-) > OK, I'll have to look into it. I'm specifically interested in how the > -js-lib entries get set. 'sdk-js-lib' is handled in JSGoogConfiguration. EdB --

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-18 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/18/13 1:33 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >>>By the way, did you see my commit for the defaults for the command >>>line arguments to FalconJx? Having those should make the launch files >>>a bit lighter, not having to set these arguments and all. >> No, I missed that. How does it work? Falco

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
>>By the way, did you see my commit for the defaults for the command >>line arguments to FalconJx? Having those should make the launch files >>a bit lighter, not having to set these arguments and all. > No, I missed that. How does it work? FalconJX is also picking up the > -library-path and main

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-18 Thread Alex Harui
OK, I've moved the as code into a subfolder. The ant build for FlexJSUI.swc is probably broken, but I'll be working on it and a uber-script now. But you should be able to modify AS classes after pulling and any further work I do should not result in a conflict. -Alex On 11/18/13 12:30 PM, "Alex

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-18 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advantage, besides >being always up to date, is that this way the

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

2013-11-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advantage, besides being always up to date, is that this way there will be a fixed URL pointing to the latest and gre