t; >Could not find the main class: org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.COMPC.
> >Program will exit.
> >Exception in thread "main"
> >
> >-Message d'origine-
> >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> >Envoyé : vendredi 7 mars 2014 18:14
>
loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
> > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
> > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:316)
> > >Could not find the main class: org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.COMPC.
> > >Program wil
ache.flex.compiler.clients.COMPC.
>Program will exit.
>Exception in thread "main"
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : vendredi 7 mars 2014 18:14
>À : dev@flex.apache.org; Erik de Bruin
>Objet : Re: [FLEXJS] IDE inte
be.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 7 mars 2014 18:14
À : dev@flex.apache.org; Erik de Bruin
Objet : Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion
Good question. What was the stack trace? Was it Google Closure that was
complaining?
On 3/7/14 8:15 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>I have installed
gmail.com] De la part
>de Carlos Rovira
>Envoyé : mardi 25 février 2014 08:25
>À : Erik de Bruin
>Cc : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion
>
>Right Erik, i was commenting that it is right for me without doubt taking
>into account that this is
6 without recompiling ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] De la part de
Carlos Rovira
Envoyé : mardi 25 février 2014 08:25
À : Erik de Bruin
Cc : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion
Right Erik, i was
t; > /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-falcon/compiler.jx
>> > [echo] GOOG_HOME: /Applications/GoogleClosure/library
>> > [java] outputBindingInfoAsData
>> > [java] Compiling file:
>> >
>> /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin
aBindingTest/bin/js-debug/StockDataJSONItemConverter.js
> > [java] Compiling file:
> >
> /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/models/MyModel.js
> > [java] Compiling file:
> >
> /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/D
arlos.rov...@gmail.com>
> [carlos.rov...@gmail.com<mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com>] on behalf of
> Carlos Rovira
> [carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com<mailto:carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:58 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@fl
.js
> > [java] Compiling file:
> >
> /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/models/MyModel.js
> > [java] Compiling file:
> >
> /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/controllers/MyCont
t; /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/MyInitialView.js
>
> -Alex
>
> From: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [carlos.rov...@gmail.com] on behalf of
> Carlos Rovira [carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com]
> Sent: Monday,
/bin/js-debug/controllers/MyController.js
>> [java] Compiling file:
>> /Users/aharui/git/flex/master/flex-asjs/examples/DataBindingTest/bin/js-debug/MyInitialView.js
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [carlos
__
> From: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [carlos.rov...@gmail.com] on behalf of
> Carlos Rovira [carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:58 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion
>
>
...@codeoscopic.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:58 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FLEXJS] IDE integration discussion
Hi Erik,
if Alex confirm that this's not done, I would try what you say. As he
state, it would be optimal to get by default both outputs, and could
deselect one or another by ru
Hi Erik,
if Alex confirm that this's not done, I would try what you say. As he
state, it would be optimal to get by default both outputs, and could
deselect one or another by running some param
Thanks
2014-02-24 17:38 GMT+01:00 Erik de Bruin :
> I guess you can call the FalconJX jar from an 'e
I guess you can call the FalconJX jar from an 'exec' task (or whatever ant
taks that runs Java stuff) with the arguments as describe earlier in the
thread and create FlexJS output that way. Haven't tried it, though.
EdB
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic
You don't get a bin folder?
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Carlos Rovira wrote:
Hi,
someone could respond to 3)
3) One of the things I like in the last months changes is the addittion of
"build.xml" per example, so we can make "ant" in the folder and quickly get
Hi,
someone could respond to 3)
3) One of the things I like in the last months changes is the addittion of
"build.xml" per example, so we can make "ant" in the folder and quickly get
the SWF version. But I think we can't get the JS version running some
"ant" (maybe with params?). Or maybe is the
Thanks Erik,
That's more clear, and I'll try to move it through IntelliJ ticket, in
parallel with my tries to get a initial environment for develop FlexJS
Thanks
Carlos
2014-02-24 10:01 GMT+01:00 Erik de Bruin :
> >
> > 1) The thread start with some FDT points proposed to get IDE support. As
>
> 1) The thread start with some FDT points proposed to get IDE support. As
> Erik state most of then are solved. @Erik, is this right? we have all the
> points covered? If not, could you point me to what point are already needed
> (not covered) ?
>
Status for the original suggestion list from th
It would be great to have a intellij user use the new installer rc to install
flexjs and see if it works. The overlay is soon to be obsolete. The ant scripts
should be cross compiling and leaving results in the bin folder
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Carlos Rovir
Hi,
as I'm a IntelliJ IDEA user (and no longer a FB user), I'm interested in
this thread and have some question, hope @Erik, @Alex or @Om could know
something about it:
1) The thread start with some FDT points proposed to get IDE support. As
Erik state most of then are solved. @Erik, is this righ
On 11/29/13 11:31 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Nov 29, 2013 10:40 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> FB has some expectations that we probably can't change. If you look at
>> the deploy scripts, some of them just don't seem necessary. Each of
>>those
>> expectations, especially the ones a
On Nov 29, 2013 10:40 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> FB has some expectations that we probably can't change. If you look at
> the deploy scripts, some of them just don't seem necessary. Each of those
> expectations, especially the ones assuming that third-party code is in the
> same folder tree, ma
FB has some expectations that we probably can't change. If you look at
the deploy scripts, some of them just don't seem necessary. Each of those
expectations, especially the ones assuming that third-party code is in the
same folder tree, makes us do more work in the installer and makes the
custom
The FlexJS SDK will be a 'regular' SDK in all aspects but for the
framework code, correct?
EdB
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think we'll be downloading FP and AIR SDKs for quite some time.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/29/13 10:31 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>>What about
I think we'll be downloading FP and AIR SDKs for quite some time.
-Alex
On 11/29/13 10:31 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>What about FlashPlayer swc? Even though it is optional for production
>use,
>they see required during development i.e. compilation time right?
>
>Also, what if the user w
What about FlashPlayer swc? Even though it is optional for production use,
they see required during development i.e. compilation time right?
Also, what if the user wants to target the AIR runtime? Could that be an
optional download?
Thanks,
Om
On Nov 29, 2013 8:13 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
I would very much prefer to download the latest version... but I think
it's more realistic to download a specific version.
I do hate that decisions like this (however logical at the moment)
always come back to bite you. Some of the libraries (the closure
compiler chief among them) will become so o
Excellent. Sounds right to me.
And yes, AUIC, the Installer will have to download the closure library.
We cannot bundle it in the binary artifacts even though it has an Apache
License. That's because an official Apache release must only contain
source and the convenience binary package must only
Ok, that is given the assumption that there is a Closure Library in
the SDK (copied there by the Installer - soon?), in the location
'[FlexJSSDKRoot]/js/lib/google/closure-library'.
EdB
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> And finally: I committed a change that resolves relat
And finally: I committed a change that resolves relative paths
correctly when the compiler is called from outside the root of the
SDK. A 'Hello World' app will now compile successfully with only this
command line call:
java -jar "[PathToFlexJSSDK]/js/lib/mxmlc.jar"
-load-config="[PathToFlexJSSDK]/
To continue this monologue: I've committed a change to the config
class that adds default relative paths (to FlexJS SDK) for the above
mentioned remaining command line arguments.
EdB
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Never mind, a liberal application of quotes solved the
Never mind, a liberal application of quotes solved the error. This
seems to be the current minimum command line:
cd "/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder 4.7/sdks/4.11.0_overlay"
java -jar "./js/lib/mxmlc.jar"
-load-config="./frameworks/flex-config.xml"
-closure-lib="/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex
Trying to cut the launch commands down to bare metal I came up with this:
SCRIPT_HOME="/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder 4.7/sdks/4.11.0_overlay"
java -Xmx384m -Dfile.encoding=UTF8 -Dsun.io.useCanonCaches=false
-Dflexcompiler=${SCRIPT_HOME} -Dflexlib=${SCRIPT_HOME}/frameworks -jar
${SCRIPT_HOME}/
35 matches
Mail list logo
