igine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 24 avril 2014 08:59
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool
I looked a quick look at the commit email. I'll take a look with a real diff
tool tomorrow. The only thing I wondered is if savedStage
ssed something:
>Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/diff/36cece0d
>
>Maurice
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 23 avril 2014 02:12
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : RE: Question ab
llem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 23 avril 2014 02:12
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Question about mobile StageText pool
> I'm surprised that each skin instance doesn't have its own
> ScrollableStageText. I would think only the StageText instances are
oid having too many savedStageText instances
(which would overflow the OS memory). Maybe something like a counter
I will sleep on it ...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 19:58
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re
in the pool dictionary.
>
>Makes sense to you?
>
>Maurice
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 19:20
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool
>
>
>
>On
referenced in the pool dictionary.
Makes sense to you?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 19:20
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool
On 4/22/14 10:07 AM, "Maurice Amsellem&qu
On 4/22/14 10:07 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>>so detaching skins does not have to be part of the lifecycle.
>I agree with that, that's why I was asking about removing listeners,
>rather than detaching skins. Is that the same ?
>IOW, do you mean that explicitly removing listeners from the sk
that principle.
But maybe I am too "purist" ;-)
WDYT?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 18:34 À
: dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool
I would think that most components do no
e I am too "purist" ;-)
WDYT?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 18:34
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool
I would think that most components do not use a pool of subcompone
closeButton.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,
>closeButton_clickHandler);
>}
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 15:12
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageT
stance == closeButton)
closeButton.removeEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,
closeButton_clickHandler);
}
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 22 avril 2014 15:12
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Question about mobile StageText pool
Don't know this cod
Don't know this code that well, but when would you trigger detaching of
the skin? Doing it on removing from stage would not be right in many
cases since the widget could come back on stage later.
-Alex
On 4/22/14 4:44 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote:
>Digging further into TextInput code, I made
Digging further into TextInput code, I made some curious findings (at least
for me):
StageText is not GCed because StyleableStageText sets event listeners on
changing, change, enter, events etc... when the skin is attached (in
TextInputBase partAdded).
2) these event listeners should be remov
13 matches
Mail list logo
