> From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 bugbase
>
>> I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>> that you're referring to
o:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:52 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 bugbase
OK. Do you know if you or I can get notifications of new bugs filed? I didn't
see any way to sign up on the bugbase site.
On 1/16/13 12:40 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrot
don
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:35 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 bugbase
>
>
>
>
> On 1/16/13 11:24 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
> wrote:
>
uot; and include a the note in the report
that the bug is in ASC 2. Ugh.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:35 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 bugbase
On 1/16/13 11:24 AM, "Michael A. Labri
On 1/16/13 11:24 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> But the logistical question is: Should we automatically bring over every
>> change for every bug? Or just selected bugs?
>> I would strongly prefer that we don't automatically copy the ASC 2.0 bug base
>> over to Apache Flex, especially by
>But the logistical question is: Should we automatically bring over every
>change for every bug? Or just selected bugs?
>I would strongly prefer that we don't automatically copy the ASC 2.0 bug base
>over to Apache Flex, especially by scraping.
Just to clarify, I didn't suggest that. I sugge
ry to follow up on this issue.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:13 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 bugbase
>I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there
On 1/16/13 11:13 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>> that you're referring to?
>
> See below:
>
> On 10/17/12 11:04 PM, "Clint Modien" wrote:
>
>> This obviously begs the questionŠ does Adobe plan on donating an
>I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>that you're referring to?
Also, for good measure:
---
"We have no plans keeping ASC 2.0 (and above) in sync with Falcon, as I said
previously, today the compilers are different projects and targeting two
different a
>I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>that you're referring to?
See below:
On 10/17/12 11:04 PM, "Clint Modien" wrote:
>This obviously begs the questionŠ does Adobe plan on donating any changes to
>ASC 2.0 back to Apache Flex?
---
>Hi Clint,
>
>No, w
> Adobe has indicated that they will not donate any patches for ASC 2.0 to
> Apache
I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
that you're referring to?
I think either Alex or I can bring over bug fixes, but I'm focused on MXML at
the moment.
- Gordon
-
>I guess that's a way to do it, but we'd also run the risk of releasing the
>wrath of Adobe. Now, I know that you and me personally wouldn't lose much
>sleep over this, but we do have to >consider Apache Flex as a neutral entity
>in all of this. Right?
I say we ask forgiveness and not permissi
On 16 January 2013 16:51, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
> >Hello gentlemen,
> (p.s. you brute there are women here too)
>
Damn, for once you're right. Next time I'll open with 'Hello ladies,
gentlemen and Mike'.
My apologies to all the women on the list, apparently I am a closeted
sexist without rea
>Hello gentlemen,
(p.s. you brute there are women here too)
>I guess we'll have to find some way to monitor the Adobe bugbase for ASC
>2.0 since Adobe has indicated that they will not donate any patches for ASC
>2.0 to Apache.
>For instance, I'm sure this issue needs to be fixed in Falcon as wel
14 matches
Mail list logo
