Bertrand was referring to the previous language on the guidelines wiki
page. After him bringing it up and many of us saw the problem with that as
well, Erik adjusted the page [1] on Dec 1 to switch from "Consensus" to
"Majority Approval".
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyv
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Harbs wrote:
>> ...So it's back to the discussion about vetoes being harmful.
>
> I don’t understand why you keep coming back to this point. No one (besides
> Justin)
> ever suggested that releases could be vetoed...
Ah sorry, I seemed to recollect
https://cw
Hi Bertrand,
> So it's back to the discussion about vetoes being harmful.
I don’t understand why you keep coming back to this point. No one (besides
Justin) ever suggested that releases could be vetoed.
On Dec 5, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:12 PM, A
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...we decided to add a new “all caps” file called
> “CONTRIBUTING" to our release packages. In examining the package, I found
> the file was misspelled as “CONTRIBITING” and felt that because it was in
> the top-level listing it would be worth s
On 12/4/14, 5:51 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>> ...I'd just like it add that it only come up as an issue as some PMC
>>members considered spelling
>> issues a "blocker" for release candidates. I'm not sure if they still
>>consider tha
The way I see the decision for this works similar to how we code in the SDK.
Follow the style and format of the existing file. So if you're modifying the
SDK you would normally mimic the code style / format that is present in that
file. Better to be consistent than have split styles.
-Mark
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> ...I'd just like it add that it only come up as an issue as some PMC members
> considered spelling
> issues a "blocker" for release candidates. I'm not sure if they still
> consider that to be the case
Based on http://www.apache.org/fou
Hi,
Thanks for your time and analysis Bertrand.
I'd just like it add that it only come up as an issue as some PMC members
considered spelling issues a "blocker" for release candidates. I'm not sure if
they still consider that to be the case.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Bertrand,
Sounds good and easy, let's see how it will work...
Thanks for your time digging into that :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:23:10 +0100
> Subject: [TTH] How to agree on International vs. US English...or similar
> things
> From: bdelacre...@apache.org
> To: dev@flex.apa
