On 1/23/17, 11:49 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>The question is how far to take this.
>
>Should every method in Effect be a separate interface? i.e. IPlayable,
>IReversable, IPausable, IStoppable, IResumable. That seems a bit
>over-the-top to me.
>
>As IEffect currently stands, Parallel needs the methods
The question is how far to take this.
Should every method in Effect be a separate interface? i.e. IPlayable,
IReversable, IPausable, IStoppable, IResumable. That seems a bit over-the-top
to me.
As IEffect currently stands, Parallel needs the methods implemented.
Personally, I think Parallel sh
On 1/22/17, 7:42 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote:
>Thanks Piotr and Alex. It’ll be an interesting exercise to see if this
>can be made into a strand. My issue with ParallelWithReverse is that
>Parallel already implements IEffect which has reverse(). What does that
>say about Parallel? Does it or does i
pache.org>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Parallel Effect
On 1/22/17, 5:05 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Yishay,
>
>Personally I'm always for as small class as we can. My +1 for
>ParallelWithReverse
I agree.
It might be worth considering making a subclass of Parallel that is a
St
On 1/22/17, 5:05 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Yishay,
>
>Personally I'm always for as small class as we can. My +1 for
>ParallelWithReverse
I agree.
It might be worth considering making a subclass of Parallel that is a
Strand so the reverse, pause and stop can be beads. Are there more than
one wa
Hi Yishay,
Personally I'm always for as small class as we can. My +1 for
ParallelWithReverse
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Parallel-Effect-tp58554p58558.html
Sent from the Apa
