Hi,
> I'm wondering, if we used sockets, would it not have the same issues?
Could have more issues - non HTTP traffic and non 80 port are more likely to be
blocked in corporate environments.
Re IE I'm not sure if AIR uses IE for all connections or just HTTP style ones.
Anyone know?
Justin
I'm wondering, if we used sockets, would it not have the same issues?
On 4/24/14 8:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> True, but I don't think these apply in this case.
>
>Not all sure, most are perm errors.roxy servers issues would do but not
>much we can do about that I guess?
>
>Justin
Hi,
> True, but I don't think these apply in this case.
Not all sure, most are perm errors.roxy servers issues would do but not much we
can do about that I guess?
Justin
On 4/24/14 4:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>See also this - seems there a lot of reasons for that error:
>http://www.judahfrangipane.com/blog/2007/02/15/error-2032-stream-error/
>
>eg proxy servers, case issues in URLs, incorrect mime types, large file
>size, incorrect cross domain etc e
Hi,
See also this - seems there a lot of reasons for that error:
http://www.judahfrangipane.com/blog/2007/02/15/error-2032-stream-error/
eg proxy servers, case issues in URLs, incorrect mime types, large file size,
incorrect cross domain etc etc
Justin
OK, installer 2.7 should be working again.
But back to the original topic: why is Installer 3.0 reporting so many
failures, especially on Windows. I have a feeling that some of it is that
2032 error one person reported which I think is a common complaint on AIR
on Windows.
-Alex
On 4/24/14 9:09
Please do.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
I can force the change out.
-Nick
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The config file is broken for installer 2.7. The installer 3.0 config
> file is ok. I've repaired the 2
I can force the change out.
-Nick
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The config file is broken for installer 2.7. The installer 3.0 config
> file is ok. I've repaired the 2.7 config file but CMS is still broken so
> it hasn't been pushed public yet.
>
> On 4/24/14 4:49 AM,
The config file is broken for installer 2.7. The installer 3.0 config
file is ok. I've repaired the 2.7 config file but CMS is still broken so
it hasn't been pushed public yet.
On 4/24/14 4:49 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>I'll update that page. The official binary builds linked from
>http://fle
I'll update that page. The official binary builds linked from
http://flex.apache.org/download-binaries.html will be fine.
Tom
On 24/04/14 12:29, Phillip wrote:
Ty Tom but it seems that builds.apache.org is down right now :-o
Will look again in a while..
mobile mail
Am 24.04.2014 um 13:14 sch
On 24/04/14 12:38, Erik de Bruin wrote:
That indicates there is an issue with the config file...
It throws an XML parser error with debug Flash players.
Tom
e
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 24 avril 2014 07:27
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : Re: New installer errors
>
> I'm going to try to ask in a different way. Watch for a new thread.
>
> On 4/23/14
In the Apache Flex installer badge, the download button is disabled:
http://flex.apache.org/installer.html
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 24 avril 2014 07:27
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: New installer errors
I'm go
Ty Tom but it seems that builds.apache.org is down right now :-o
Will look again in a while..
mobile mail
Am 24.04.2014 um 13:14 schrieb Tom Chiverton :
> On 24/04/14 12:02, Phillip wrote:
>> The flexsdk installer shows empty dropdowns for every OS, therefore its not
>> possible to install an s
On 24/04/14 12:02, Phillip wrote:
The flexsdk installer shows empty dropdowns for every OS, therefore its not
possible to install an sdk.
If you have Ant locally, you can follow the alternative installer
instructions linked from the download page.
Tom
just wanzed to notice everyone:
The flexsdk installer shows empty dropdowns for every OS, therefore its not
possible to install an sdk.
mobile mail
Am 24.04.2014 um 07:27 schrieb Alex Harui :
> I'm going to try to ask in a different way. Watch for a new thread.
>
> On 4/23/14 4:29 PM, "Justin
I'm going to try to ask in a different way. Watch for a new thread.
On 4/23/14 4:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Over the last few days and not looking good. Anyone have any idea to what
>the issue(s) may be and why we getting so many installs failing?
>
>There seems to be more issues on
Hi,
Over the last few days and not looking good. Anyone have any idea to what the
issue(s) may be and why we getting so many installs failing?
There seems to be more issues on windows (permissions, https issue?) or perhaps
we just have a few bad mirrors out there (anyway to check this?) or perh
18 matches
Mail list logo
