Re: Naming AS3 future versions - was Re: Language features

2013-02-05 Thread Avi Kessner
My apologies. It's just such an interesting topic, real or imagined. brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Right, > > I don't have a bunch of time for all this water cooler talk but my head > lives in the NOW. You

Re: Naming AS3 future versions - was Re: Language features

2013-02-05 Thread Roland Zwaga
I never claimed there should be a name change right now. I was asking a question about what happens to AS3 when both Apache and Adobe make different changes to it. It was more of a discussion point then a direct action point :) On 5 February 2013 12:28, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Right, > > I don

Naming AS3 future versions - was Re: Language features

2013-02-05 Thread Michael Schmalle
Right, I don't have a bunch of time for all this water cooler talk but my head lives in the NOW. You know how far off generics are? Do we have any other compiler developers around to start pushing Falcon forward? If the answer is NO right now, than AS3 is all you have to worry about. I a