On 5/10/13 11:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think that may be because your textlayout repo is not in the expected
>> places. I am updating the local-template properties so if you set TLF_HOME
>> appropriately in local.properties it should work (it did for me after I
>> moved my t
Hi,
> I think that may be because your textlayout repo is not in the expected
> places. I am updating the local-template properties so if you set TLF_HOME
> appropriately in local.properties it should work (it did for me after I
> moved my textlayout repo somewhere else).
I'm setting TLF_HOME en
I think that may be because your textlayout repo is not in the expected
places. I am updating the local-template properties so if you set TLF_HOME
appropriately in local.properties it should work (it did for me after I
moved my textlayout repo somewhere else).
On 5/10/13 9:28 PM, "Justin Mclean"
Hi,
> I ran ant from in the textlayout, spark, mx, mobilecomponents, and
> mobiletheme folders and they all ran to completion. What errors are you
> getting?
Run ant at frameworks get:
lean-external:
[echo] cleaning ${TLF_HOME}
BUILD FAILED
/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopG
For Linux support, me and one of this mailing list figured how to run it,
my self I was able to run it in Ubuntu and it explained here how it is done
:
http://saleh360.blogspot.com/2013/04/up-and-running-with-apache-flex-on.html?m=1
On May 10, 2013 11:44 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/5/13
On 5/5/13 10:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> I thought this was working except for running just the TLF folder?
> It's more broken that that - there several project level builds are also
> broken if you try to build them on their own.
I ran ant from in the textlayout, spark, mx, mobilecompo
I'll go the long way round ;-)
EdB
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Nick is right, but I don't understand why you are getting these files to
> show up in rat. Are those 3 targets the equivalent of "ant release"?
> Otherwise, it isn't a fair test as the "release" target migh
Nick is right, but I don't understand why you are getting these files to
show up in rat. Are those 3 targets the equivalent of "ant release"?
Otherwise, it isn't a fair test as the "release" target might otherwise
delete those files (since they are binaries and shouldn't be in a source
package).
I think we have a list of "Excluded" files so the RAT report ignores files
that can't or shouldn't have the license header in them. According to my
IDE, those files are listed on lines 1668:1701 in the build.xml (ANT
builder). We don't add the license header to binaries such as SWF,
because, well
If I run:
ant main
ant source-package
ant rat-check
I get a rat.report with 5 unapproved licenses:
/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/temp/frameworks/javascript/fabridge/samples/EmptySwf.swf
/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/temp/frameworks/javascript/fabridge/sample
Never one to shy away from a daunting task, I've taken on the 'missing
headers' issue...
I can run 'ant release' successfully (after fixing the JavaCC URL) and
get a nice 'rat.report'. I've fixed the headers in the
'experimental/bundles' property files that ant reports.
Running 'ant release' take
I do some bug work on those major / critical ones later.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:59 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Making an new Apache Flex release
Hi,
Develop and trunk are drifting further apart
On 5/5/13 10:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I was wondering when you were going to come up for air. You and Mark have
>> been on a great run.
> More to come - lots of little date, time and number and formatting issues
> still to look at. :-)
>
>> I thought this was working except
Hi,
> I was wondering when you were going to come up for air. You and Mark have
> been on a great run.
More to come - lots of little date, time and number and formatting issues still
to look at. :-)
> I thought this was working except for running just the TLF folder?
It's more broken that that
On 5/5/13 8:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Develop and trunk are drifting further apart and we have a fair number of bug
> fixes, support for newer version of AIR and FP, some new experimental
> components, so probably about time we started thinking about a release. The
> longer we l
Hi,
Develop and trunk are drifting further apart and we have a fair number of bug
fixes, support for newer version of AIR and FP, some new experimental
components, so probably about time we started thinking about a release. The
longer we leave it the harder it will be to make a release. So who
16 matches
Mail list logo
