On 10/5/16, 8:20 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/5/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>>But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the
>>Ant build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib
>>... we should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't
On 10/5/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the
>Ant build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib
>... we should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't really know what that's
>doing).
>
>
>I'll have a l
tz
Cc: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
Hi Chris,
I see the arquetype generated pom only refers to one execution. This is an
excerpt form my pom.xml (not notified by me):
compile-javascript
> *Von:* carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 08:39:00
> *An:* dev@flex.apache.org
> *Cc:* Christofer Dutz
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
>
> That sounds to be the problem
I configured the compilation for the examples to build both the swf and the js
version.
Chris
Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos
Rovira
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 08:39:00
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW:
dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
That sounds to be the problem ( as well making 2 builds js+swf at a time)
2016-10-05 1:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>:
On 10/4/16, 2:04 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com<mailto:car
That sounds to be the problem ( as well making 2 builds js+swf at a time)
2016-10-05 1:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>
> On 10/4/16, 2:04 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>
> wrote:
>
> >Right now, I have maven build as well VSCode/NextGenAS IDE build. Maven is
> >more slow
On 10/4/16, 2:04 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Right now, I have maven build as well VSCode/NextGenAS IDE build. Maven is
>more slow that Josh's (40 sec vs 5 sec for a hello world), I suppose this
>is due to lots of checks maven do. Maybe do you have some conf
On 10/4/16, 1:45 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for fixing it. I hope it helped get a little insight on how maven
>works and that it helps getting comfortable with it.
Yes, it helped me learn a bit more about Maven.
>
>
>One thing though ... if the output is set to a file it adds th
ed up things even
more, we should do that.
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Carlos Rovira
Datum: 04.10.16 23:47 (GMT+01:00)
An: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
I could say that the almost most of the ti
ov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 22:26:44
> *An:* dev@flex.apache.org
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
>
> Amazing!, it works Alex. Thanks!
>
> I finaly could build my flexjs test project generated with the a
enstag, 4. Oktober 2016 22:26:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
Amazing!, it works Alex. Thanks!
I finaly could build my flexjs test project generated with the archetype
and run it :)
So for me this is a huge milestone for flexjs :D
2016-10-04 20:11 GM
gt; >clean install") or do a "mvn clean install" of the complete compiler
> >project.
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >
> >Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
> >
> >
> > Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----
> >Von: Al
m: 04.10.16 19:00 (GMT+01:00)
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
>
>
>
>On 10/4/16, 9:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>>Well you could override it in the pom, but I don't think that I do that.
>>It should always be the def
.10.16 19:00 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
On 10/4/16, 9:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well you could override it in the pom, but I don't think that I do that.
>It should always be the default defines in the mojo. I only
On 10/4/16, 9:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well you could override it in the pom, but I don't think that I do that.
>It should always be the default defines in the mojo. I only expose config
>options to customize, the default should apply in most cases, especially
>the framework build.
OK.
On 10/4/16, 9:42 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>It looks like the pom.xml files specify the output as well. Can you
>quickly answer if the pom.xml overrides the getOutput in CompileJSMojo?
Wait, never mind. I didn't see it in the pom it was in the generated
compile-js-config.xml. I'll figure it
phone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Alex Harui
Datum: 04.10.16 18:43 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
On 10/4/16, 9:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>I noticed how late it must have been at you
On 10/4/16, 9:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>I noticed how late it must have been at your end after sending my mail.
>So sorry for that.
>
>I guess I'm just totally frustrated, that I keep on cleaning up stuff,
>and as soon as it's done I have to start again.
IMO, your goal sho
ly simply have to change what you return here.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 16:52:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Jenkins still red
On 10/4/16, 3:22 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
&
On 10/4/16, 3:22 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>as you seem to be responding to everything else I guess you missed my
>asking you to rollback your changes and move them to a feature branch.
>Are you going to revert
>
>b8d8c48b11f41ea435eefafc94eb0927229e8a4b
>
>It's ok that it "sli
lf or
write that documentation immediately and I would prefer a little discussion on
what's changed and not having to reverse engineer mentioned commit.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 08:35:33
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff:
erged back.
In the meanwhile, I'll add some documentation about the plugin to the compilers
site.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 20:47:58
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Jenkins still red
On 10/3/16, 11:41 AM, "carlos.rov...
On 10/3/16, 11:41 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I think what I propose is better to do the next time. Right now better to
>finish the ticket.
>
>Regarding the maven plugin, as I understand, is not broken...there's
>nothing to fix, as I understand i
Hi Alex,
I think what I propose is better to do the next time. Right now better to
finish the ticket.
Regarding the maven plugin, as I understand, is not broken...there's
nothing to fix, as I understand is a problem os code broken. If not I'm
missing something and better Chris to throw some light
On 10/3/16, 10:55 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>since Friday Jenkins build is broken (check :
>https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/)
>
> I suppose that is caused by the changes Alex are doing in develop to
>compjsc changes.
>
>Hope you guys cou
Hi,
since Friday Jenkins build is broken (check :
https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/)
I suppose that is caused by the changes Alex are doing in develop to
compjsc changes.
Hope you guys could consider to make those kind of changes in a branch
(Chris talked about a way of doing this a
27 matches
Mail list logo
