On May 20, 2014 12:11 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Should we perhaps revert back to the earlier version of the Installer
while
> > we investigate this?
>
> It's not 100% certain that the old installer wasn't getting that many
failures.
Not sure if I follow. Triple negatives are confu
On 5/20/14 12:06 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
>> >
>> >I can add the console log tracking right away if you are okay with
>> >releasing that as 3.0.1. Works?
>> Any concerns the log gets too long or is too different so it is hard to
>> track? I was going to try to add some status string
Hi,
> Should we perhaps revert back to the earlier version of the Installer while
> we investigate this?
It's not 100% certain that the old installer wasn't getting that many failures.
From what people have reported I'd assume the new installer is getting more
errors but that's just a guess. Fe
On May 19, 2014 11:59 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/19/14 11:35 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On May 19, 2014 11:28 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> >>
> >> I believe we don't know if the failure rate is lower with 2.7. It
could
> >> simply be the same, especially if folks are getting a
On 5/19/14 11:35 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On May 19, 2014 11:28 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> I believe we don't know if the failure rate is lower with 2.7. It could
>> simply be the same, especially if folks are getting as far as antlr,
>>gcc,
>> or some other third-party download b
problem by releasing Apache BlazeDS and switching
> >>to
> >> >that. The Apache Servers should be able to handle the load.
> >> >Same with some of the libs. I have noticed the Ant scripts download a
> >>lot
> >> >of libs from project-servers. These tend to go off
the load.
>> >Same with some of the libs. I have noticed the Ant scripts download a
>>lot
>> >of libs from project-servers. These tend to go offline now and then. I
>> >would suggest to download these from Maven Central instead, as this
>>will
>> >p
>
> >
> >____
> >Von: omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash
> >Muppirala
> >Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 09:18
> >An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >Betreff: Installer failure rate is way to high
> >
> >Here
akash
>Muppirala
>Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 09:18
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Installer failure rate is way to high
>
>Here is the break down for the last 30 days:
>
> /track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK
>4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=windows
>1,
@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Installer failure rate is way to high
Here is the break down for the last 30 days:
/track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK
4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=windows
1,458
/track-installer.html?version=4.12.0&os=windows
1,105
*/track-installer.html?failure=true&label
Here is the break down for the last 30 days:
/track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK
4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=windows
1,458
/track-installer.html?version=4.12.0&os=windows
1,105
*/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache Flex SDK
4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=windows*
821
/track-installer.ht
11 matches
Mail list logo
