On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> ...I did tell the list: "I'm having an issue with the 'installer.xml', where
> it works on regular ant, but not on 'ant-on-air' (which the Installer uses).
> Testing a fix, hope to make new RC available in a couple of hrs."...
At the risk o
Hi,
> I’m not sure who you are referring to, but this email seems to have an
> accusatory tone.
There is no intended tone or accusation it is just a simple question noting
more, nothing less.
Justin
Hi,
> I did tell the list: "I'm having an issue with the 'installer.xml', where
> it works on regular ant, but not on 'ant-on-air' (which the Installer uses).
>
> Testing a fix, hope to make new RC available in a couple of hrs."
>
> And then, an hour or so later: "That went better than expected
On 1/26/15, 1:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here's the full URL string:
>/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0
>RC2&version=4.14.0&os=macno processor for formatnull
>
>There were 32 installs of RC2, with 8 errors 4 of which were the above
>error and all 4 error
Justin, you're doing it again :-(
I did tell the list: "I'm having an issue with the 'installer.xml', where
it works on regular ant, but not on 'ant-on-air' (which the Installer uses).
Testing a fix, hope to make new RC available in a couple of hrs."
And then, an hour or so later: "That went bet
Hi,
Here's the full URL string:
/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0
RC2&version=4.14.0&os=macno processor for formatnull
There were 32 installs of RC2, with 8 errors 4 of which were the above error
and all 4 error occurred on Friday.
If this s was a known issue (by
Hi,
> Been away for the past couple weeks and just catching up on everything.
> Do these errors occur with the latest un-released version on the installer
> or are these errors with the current publicly available version?
It's the currently available one.
Justin
[mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: January-26-15 12:42 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Installer error rate with 4.14 RC
Hi,
JFYI
The installer error rate for 4.14 RCs looks higher than normal (at about
50%) and there a new error I've not seen before:
"no processor for formatnull&qu
>>> What are the stats since RC2 was announced?
>>
>>About 30% but RC2 had that issue > 50% of errors were that one.
>
> That’s strange. The “format” tag was used in the nightly until Friday,
> then Erik replaced it.
Furthermore, it was only in there for a little while, between I
figured out what
On 1/26/15, 12:15 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> What are the stats since RC2 was announced?
>
>About 30% but RC2 had that issue > 50% of errors were that one.
That’s strange. The “format” tag was used in the nightly until Friday,
then Erik replaced it.
How many installs happened on Fr
Hi,
> What are the stats since RC2 was announced?
About 30% but RC2 had that issue > 50% of errors were that one.
Justin
On 1/25/15, 11:42 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>JFYI
>
>The installer error rate for 4.14 RCs looks higher than normal (at about
>50%) and there a new error I've not seen before:
>"no processor for formatnull"
What are the stats since RC2 was announced? Prior to that, there was a
day or
Hi,
On the up side, 4.13.0 has had almost 18,000 installs via the installer.
Justin
Hi,
JFYI
The installer error rate for 4.14 RCs looks higher than normal (at about 50%)
and there a new error I've not seen before:
"no processor for formatnull"
There's no errors other than that one above that particularly stands out.
Justin
14 matches
Mail list logo
