On 9/14/14 2:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>> I can't see why 4.12 isn't actually working as the instal script does
>>> have paths that should work. Is this a bug with the installer?
>> You sure you pulled the right tag? That looks like the HEAD that I
>> modified a couple of days ago.
On 9/14/14 2:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Anyone know what the direct download link is?
>http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/
>osmf.swc
>
>Not sure this link will work in the config file:
>http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/f
Hi,
>> I can't see why 4.12 isn't actually working as the instal script does
>> have paths that should work. Is this a bug with the installer?
> You sure you pulled the right tag? That looks like the HEAD that I
> modified a couple of days ago.
I pulled the right tag - this is it on git hub:
ht
Hi,
Anyone know what the direct download link is?
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/osmf.swc
Not sure this link will work in the config file:
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/osmf.swc?format=raw
http://sourceforge.
>I can put OSMF1 on SF.
Should be here now:
http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/o
smf.swc
-Alex
On 9/12/14 5:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>> So we would have to replace the binaries right? As that is where it
>>>gets
>>> the installer script from?
>> Yes.
>
>So we would need to branch 4.12 and 4.12.1, modify the installer.xml,
>repackage, vote and release to fix?
I suppose so, bu
Hi,
>> So we would have to replace the binaries right? As that is where it gets
>> the installer script from?
> Yes.
So we would need to branch 4.12 and 4.12.1, modify the installer.xml,
repackage, vote and release to fix?
I'm sure this isn't going to be the first time we get an issue like this
On 9/12/14 3:03 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Are we seeing lots of folks try to install the broken versions?
>
>A reasonable number. 4.9 < 5 day, 4.10 < 5 day, 4.11 about 10 day, 4.12
>about 15 a day (higher recently). So we talking about 40 installs a day,
>not huge but significant.
>
Hi,
> Are we seeing lots of folks try to install the broken versions?
A reasonable number. 4.9 < 5 day, 4.10 < 5 day, 4.11 about 10 day, 4.12 about
15 a day (higher recently). So we talking about 40 installs a day, not huge but
significant.
> 4.12 uses hardcoded URLs in the script.
So we wou
Are we seeing lots of folks try to install the broken versions?
4.12 uses hardcoded URLs in the script. 4.11 and earlier might be getting
the URLs from sdk-config-xx so maybe updating older versions of that xml
file will fix 4.9 and 4.10.
-Alex
On 9/12/14 1:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
Hi,
This come up on the user list the other day so I decide to take a look - the
current situation isn't good. Currently only 4.11 and 4.13 are working. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34540 for more detail.
Any idea why 4.11 works but 4.12 doesn't?
What can be done to fix thi
11 matches
Mail list logo