Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Dasa Paddock
-p or --prune will "remove any remote-tracking branches which no longer exist on the remote" [1] This just helps to keep your clone in sync with the remote. [1]: http://git-scm.com/docs/git-fetch --Dasa On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> git fetch - prune > > Why

Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > git fetch - prune Why the -prune option? And what if any are the issues if you don't do this? Justin

Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Dasa Paddock
Only the current branch. http://git-scm.com/docs/git-pull --Dasa On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Gordon Smith mailto:gosm...@adobe.com>> wrote: So now that I have two local branches, will 'git pull' update both of them, or only the current branch?

Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Jose Barragan
Ok Gordon, I will try to explain to you how it works, I hope to do :).. When cloning a GIT repository, what you get is just that, a complete clone the remote repository. Well, GIT shows you how local branches that are available for use in your working copy, and as remote, which represent the br

Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
use git branch --all to see local and remote branches, local branches are created at checkout time. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Gordon Smith Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:21 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches You

RE: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Gordon Smith
ssage- From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:00 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches The way I understand it, if you do "git checkout develop", it will give you a local copy of the develop

Re: I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Erik de Bruin
The way I understand it, if you do "git checkout develop", it will give you a local copy of the develop branch that tracks 'origin/develop'… but I'm also just learning git, so please correct me if I'm explaining this wrong. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht

I'm confused about local vs. remote branches

2013-03-18 Thread Gordon Smith
I've cloned the flex-sdk repo. When I do 'git branch' all I see is * master but when I do 'git branch -a' I see * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/develop remotes/origin/patches remotes/origin/release4.9 I'm not clear on how to read this, but it looks like the remote r