Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I want to RELEASE_NOTE and README (from the develop and release branches) into the develop branch. But it's more about getting the process documented so we can actually make a release at some point. We want to make it as simple as possible for anyone who wants to put up there hand as a rel

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Ok, tell me what files you want to merge, I'll do that tomorrow when I wake up, it's too now here 4:10. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:02 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES H

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
and I just noticed as well, to check the diff on RELEASE_NOTES, use: git diff origin/release4.9 RELEASE_NOTES -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:31 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES Re wrote

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > if you have files with conflicts you want to merge, you will have to go by an > intermediary branch This is almost always going to be the case with a release as it take time to vote on and create serval release candidates while develop work continues on in develop. > apparently the RELE

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
then continue the rebase. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:23 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES If we want to merge the entire tree would we follow the same process? (eg like what we have

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
;origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 2:39 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES Hi, ok, so, you need to go by an intermediary branch as git merge or rebase only commits It there a simpler way of doing this? In svn it just a &quo

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > ok, so, you need to go by an intermediary branch as git merge or rebase only > commits It there a simpler way of doing this? In svn it just a "svn merge" followed by a "svn ci" - assuming you're happy with the merge. If we want to merge the entire tree would we follow the same process? (

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
evelop git rebase temp git mergeTool RELEASE_NOTES git rebase --continue git mergeTool git rebase --continue git mergeTool git rebase --continue git branch -d temp git push -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:20 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: R

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > git checkout origin/release4.9 RELEASE_NOTES That just replaces the current RELEASE_NOTES file with the 4.9 one. What do you need to do to merge the changes on both files together? Thanks, Justin

Re: Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
From your clean develop branch: git checkout origin/release4.9 RELEASE_NOTES git commit -m "Merge RELEASE_NOTES, etc.. from release4.9 branch" git push -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:26 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Git

Git merge of README and RELEASE_NOTES

2013-04-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Can someone go through the git steps required to merge the READ and RELEASE_NOTES files in the 4.9.1 branch into the current develop branch. Thanks, Justin