On 9/3/13 1:17 PM, "labri...@digitalprimates.net"
wrote:
>>I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference
>>with those who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their
>>patches would have likely already been integrated.
>
>None have agreements. I can post a comme
>FWIW, Adobe did not need to contact any of its prior patch providers because
>the terms and conditions of providing the patch gave Adobe ownership and
>therefore the right to donate.
We did have an agreement, in fact the Adobe one since FlexUnit .9 was under the
Adobe banner. This had to be si
>I will check the patches and see if any of the names cross-reference with
>those who had signed agreements, but I highly doubt it or their patches would
>have likely already been integrated.
None have agreements. I can post a comment on each github issue asking them to
approve the integration
Hi
There are still 4 patches for FlexUnit in JIRA which needs approvment by
their author. They only have to approve the move to Apache through a JIRA
comment . I tried to get in contact with them but was only successful with
one person.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33571
https://iss
FWIW, Adobe did not need to contact any of its prior patch providers
because the terms and conditions of providing the patch gave Adobe
ownership and therefore the right to donate.
Was there any similar agreement for FlexUnit?
-Alex
On 9/3/13 8:50 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote:
>Hi
>
>There are sti
