>Would it be too hard to keep both versions alive until they can be merged on
>git?
It's not hard to keep the code separate, its more about trying to get all of
the flex support back into one place where there are more than just my eyes on
it.
Mike
Would it be too hard to keep both versions alive until they can be merged
on git?
On Jan 11, 2013 10:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/11/13 12:12 PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
> > labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >
> >>> Do we
On 1/11/13 12:12 PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
> labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>
>>> Do we know who owns it? Is that person willing to donate the code to the
>> ASF?
>>
>> I own it. I donated it. The grant was filed with Apache last
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >Do we know who owns it? Is that person willing to donate the code to the
> ASF?
>
> I own it. I donated it. The grant was filed with Apache last august.
>
I'm sorry. I should've done the research :-) Ok
>Do we know who owns it? Is that person willing to donate the code to the ASF?
I own it. I donated it. The grant was filed with Apache last august.
We have just been waiting to figure out where to put it. Problem is, since it's
not Apache yet, all support and other things are happening outside
Do we know who owns it? Is that person willing to donate the code to the
ASF?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
> labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>
> > >That would probably
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> My vote is to get it over here. I don't see the GIT thing moving forward
> in the next 6 months, IMHO.
>
> -Nick
>
+1 to what Nick said.
I think we should wait. I don't recall anyone on this list itching to make
any changes to FlexUnit. I see lots of activity in infra working on the Git
stuff. Hopefully we can move to Git "soon".
On 1/11/13 11:14 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> My vote is to get it over here. I don't see
My vote is to get it over here. I don't see the GIT thing moving forward
in the next 6 months, IMHO.
-Nick
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
> labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrot
What about just moving it into SVN and keeping the GitHub repo to browse
the history up to that point?
-omar
On Friday, January 11, 2013, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
> labri...@digitalprimates.net > wrote:
>
> > >That would probably save
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >That would probably save one migration, otherwise you'll have to
> >migrate
> to SVN and then to Git again, sounds like a pain...
>
> I am mostly concerned about losing the history and the GIT to SVN
11 matches
Mail list logo