Dammit ... I which I could build this with Maven ... ;-)
Chris
Am 03.11.16, 07:37 schrieb "Justin Mclean" :
Hi,
Turns out it was only used inside tests for Texen in velocity which as far
as I can tell is not being used. Velocity and SDK still compile without it and
can compile sam
Hi,
Turns out it was only used inside tests for Texen in velocity which as far as I
can tell is not being used. Velocity and SDK still compile without it and can
compile sample application with SDK missing these files.
I’d appreciate it if someone else tested this out, the change has been
comm
ssful.
I would definitely opt for updating to an official version.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Justin Mclean
Datum: 02.11.16 01:12 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: FlexSDK license issue
Hi,
In one of the discu
Hi,
In one of the discussions on legal discuss it was pointed out that the Apache
1.0 license [1] contains an advertising clause which actually makes it Category
X / incompatible with the Apache 1.1/2.0 licenses.
It turns out that Adobe used some Apache 1.0 licensed code in the Flex SDK from
t
