Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Jun Heider
On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Sean Thayne wrote: > Hi Jun, > > Your correct, but at the same time. If you play with Feathers, you will > realize quickly they don't really give you a UI. They give you controllers > for a UI. You still need to code up ever object that is going to be > displaye

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Alex Harui
On 2/12/14 11:25 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Feb 12, 2014 11:05 AM, "Sean Thayne" wrote: >> >> I think it would be interesting, but not really realistic. >> >> The creator of Starling was unable to use the standard Flash Event and >EventDispatcher. So he instead created his own. That

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ipient classes for example. >> >> David >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jun Heider >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:43 PM >> Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk >> >> &g

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread flex
Text auto complete messed that up ... *mail = mxml *VP = VM *recipient = rpc -Original Message- From: f...@dfguy.us To: dev@flex.apache.org Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 1:00 PM Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk I did a flex mobile app and also compiled an example feathers

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Sean Thayne
3 PM Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Thayne wrote: I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling/AS3 is much faster than Flex. But it doesn'

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread flex
he.org Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:43 PM Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Thayne wrote: > I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for > Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Sean Thayne
Hi Jun, Your correct, but at the same time. If you play with Feathers, you will realize quickly they don't really give you a UI. They give you controllers for a UI. You still need to code up ever object that is going to be displayed. Feathers does make it easier, but I'd really say it only gi

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Jun Heider
On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Thayne wrote: > I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for > Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling/AS3 is much > faster than Flex. But it doesn't have any real components/features. So you > need to code up e

Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Sean Thayne
I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling/AS3 is much faster than Flex. But it doesn't have any real components/features. So you need to code up everything from the ground. -Sean Thayne On Wed, Feb 12, 2

Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk

2014-02-12 Thread Jake Churchill
Hello All, I'm curious if anyone has any benchmarks for some sample apps or real apps that show the differences between pure actionscript and flex framework usage in the mobile arena. I read that it's better to use pure actionscript if possible but I can't seem to find out HOW MUCH better it is.