> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:33 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
> IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait
> to see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple.
>
> If you are a famou
ay, December 18, 2013 11:33 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
>IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait
>to see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple.
>
>If you are a famous celebrity and happen to b
ve.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:33 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait
to see if you get caught, even if the
show X.
-Alex
>
>Maurice
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
>Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 23:35
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
>Maybe i can blur all the l
To counter your point about commercial use never being fair use:; I'll
quote TechDirt (
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131125/10182325360/beastie-boys-say-they-dont-want-music-ads-fair-use-doesnt-care.shtml
) quoting a Supreme Court ruling (
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/
Fair Use is pretty limited in the USA, and is usually regarded in terms of
education or personal use. Advertisement is generally not allowed under
fair-use but again, that is something for the legal-beagles to
determine ;)
-Nick
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
t was suggested.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 23:35
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
Maybe i can blur all the logos and pictures in screenshots, and maybe the
sssoftware.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 23:14
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
> Hi,
>
> Under US law there is also a fair use provision, which the showcase would
> probably come under (and permission is not required), but it IMO always best
> to ask.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 23:14
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
Hi,
Under US law there is also a fair use provision, which the showcase would
probably come under (and permission is not required), but it IMO always best to
ask.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Under US law there is also a fair use provision, which the showcase would
probably come under (and permission is not required), but it IMO always best to
ask.
Thanks,
Justin
gt;>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 12/18/13 5:12 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks, Eric,
> >>>> But Apache tends to "wary" about legal stuff, so I pre
On 12/18/13 12:22 PM, "Erick Ghaumez" wrote:
>As I¹ve said, the owner is « big » TV group, my contract is with a
>subsidiary company in charge of digital projects. I don¹t know if the one
>who signs my contract is legally authorized to give this permission. But
>if I understand, if he gives one,
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Eric,
>>>> But Apache tends to "wary" about legal stuff, so I prefer to ask for
>>>> team
>>>> advice.
>>>>
>>>> Maurice
>>>>
>>>> -Message d'origine
Done. (bot update pending)
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
Yes, that would probably be the safe thing to do.
Thanks and sorry for the hassle,
On 12/18/13 5:12 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Eric,
>>> But Apache tends to "wary" about legal stuff, so I prefer to ask for
>>>team
>>> advice.
>>>
>>> Maurice
>>>
>>> -
ile waiting for the legal stuff to be
>fixed.?
>
>Maurice
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:33
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
>IMO, it is not a good ide
:33
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait to
see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple.
If you are a famous celebrity and happen to buy a particular brand of clothing
and someone see
rom
>>the owners.
>
>Also what I think. thanks
>
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
>Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 16:11
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : RE: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
>Ma
mercredi 18 décembre 2013 16:11
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Flex Showcase legal aspects
Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the screen
shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests from the owners.
-Mark
Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the screen
shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests from the owners.
-Mark
écembre 2013 16:01
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
I obviously understand these legal doubts, but IMHO for the use of this 3
screenshots, it will be endless.
What kind of permission can be legal ? Is there a template document somewhere ?
I can ask to the M6Web's
ache tends to "wary" about legal stuff, so I prefer to ask for team
>> advice.
>>
>> Maurice
>>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
>> Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:39
: Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
We can ask on legal-discuss if you want to be certain, but I would guess the
answer is yes, we need permission from the owner. But Erick is probably not
wrong about the taking of screenshots either. My thought experiment is this:
If I was hired to paint the ou
>De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
>Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:39
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>
>Hi,
>
>i'm working on this project, and since it's a public website, i think
>it'
Thanks, Eric,
But Apache tends to "wary" about legal stuff, so I prefer to ask for team
advice.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : rx labz [mailto:rxl...@gmail.com] De la part de Erick Ghaumez
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 13:39
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re
Hi,
i’m working on this project, and since it’s a public website, i think it’s
absolutly not illegal to display screenshots.
Erick
Le 18 déc. 2013 à 13:34, Maurice Amsellem a écrit
:
> Hi,
>
> A few app submissions (eg. "6play"
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34005 ) are made
Hi,
A few app submissions (eg. "6play"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34005 ) are made by what looks like
developers sub-contracting for another company.
Do you think there is a legal issue to include these apps (eg. the screenshots)
without the permission of the owning company (m6
27 matches
Mail list logo
