gine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 13 octobre 2013 07:11
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Failing mustella tests
On 10/12/13 5:39 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>What make a good test is it being consistently repeatable. We seem
first time, the difference was that the text in the 2
upper locked rows was actually not locked, thus the difference.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 13 octobre 2013 07:14
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Failing mustella
Shouldn't be, but you never know.
BTW, I ran into a household plumbing issue this evening and now I'm out of
time. I'll review the README and RELEASE_NOTES tomorrow. Yes, you've
been pre-empted by poop.
On 10/12/13 11:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Now it's worked 4 times in a row.
Hi,
> Now it's worked 4 times in a row.
BTW that's with 11.1, I was on 11.9 before that - perhaps it's a FP version
issue?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> If you watch it run and fail, is focus still ending up in the textinput on
> the bottom?
Now it's worked 4 times in a row.
However as far as I can see nothing actually gets the focus (no blue focus
indicators) and the radio buttons are always unselected.
Do we know if the test is passi
Hmm. I ran that and got 49 and 0 on the first try.
If you watch it run and fail, is focus still ending up in the textinput on
the bottom?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/12/13 10:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It was failing for me. I run the test a few more times and got it to pass
>with:
>
>
Hi,
It was failing for me. I run the test a few more times and got it to pass with:
[java] =
[java] Passes: 49
[java] Fails: 0
[java] =
To be clear this is the test
rb
> [java]
>
>
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
>Envoyé : dimanche 13 octobre 2013 02:44
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Failing mustella tests
>
>Hi,
>
>For this test:
>[java] components/
On 10/12/13 5:39 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>What make a good test is it being consistently repeatable. We seem to
>have a different number of tests on each platform and different results
>which may be environment dependant??
>
>It's hard to tell from the exclusions list what is excluded
>
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
>Envoyé : dimanche 13 octobre 2013 02:44
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Failing mustella tests
>
>Hi,
>
>For this test:
>[java] components/RadioButton/Styl
out waiting for focusIn from rb
[java]
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 13 octobre 2013 02:44
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Failing mustella tests
Hi,
For this test:
[java] component
Hi,
For this test:
[java] components/RadioButton/Styles/RadioButton_Mirroring_Styles
RadioButton_Styles_Mirroring_RTL_focusRing Failed DispatchKeyEvent(body:step 2)
Timeout waiting for focusIn from rb
I'm still seeing an issue after Alex's test changes have been merged into
develop - any
Hi,
What make a good test is it being consistently repeatable. We seem to have a
different number of tests on each platform and different results which may be
environment dependant??
It's hard to tell from the exclusions list what is excluded, is there a way for
mustella to show how many tests
01:26
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Failing mustella tests
Hi,
For this failure:
[java] mx/states/Transition/properties/Transition_autoReverse
Transition_autoReverse_Wipe_Full Failed AssertPropertyValue(body:step 4)
transTemplate.monitor.passed false != true
On OSX I get these results:
Hi,
For this failure:
[java] mx/states/Transition/properties/Transition_autoReverse
Transition_autoReverse_Wipe_Full Failed AssertPropertyValue(body:step 4)
transTemplate.monitor.passed false != true
On OSX I get these results:
./mini_run.sh tests/mx/states/Transition
[java] =
15 matches
Mail list logo
