Hi,
> I agree that it might be unconventional, but it could be a valid scenario
> and the test failures are warning that some customer might also get busted
> by these changes.
Basically what happening it that it's converting the text from the label
function to a number and getting zero - not exa
On 8/14/13 1:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Still looking into the DG issue.
>1. The tests are probably wrong or at least unconventional. Tests are
>passing an array of numbers as the dataProvider of an editable DG with a
>label function.
I agree that it might be unconventional, but it c
Hi,
Still looking into the DG issue.
1. The tests are probably wrong or at least unconventional. Tests are passing
an array of numbers as the dataProvider of an editable DG with a label function.
2. Looks like there are several place where the code assumes data is an object
and not a String, Num
