Ah, I see what's happening. If I change the SDK by selecting 'Use a
specific SDK', it warns me about overwriting the html-template files. But,
if I keep the 'Use default SDK' but change the default SDK in the
'Configurie Flex SDK's screen, then there is no such warnings. The new
default SDK is i
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/5/16, 1:07 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >>
> >> IIRC, if you change SDKs, it will copy the index.template.html file from
> >> the SDK fol
On 1/5/16, 1:07 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> IIRC, if you change SDKs, it will copy the index.template.html file from
>> the SDK folder.
>>
>
>I don't think so. I've changed SDKs for a project several
On 1/5/16, 1:06 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Jan 5, 2016 9:36 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>>
>> asjsc still generates all of the addDependency() calls required for a
>debug
>> build. No hand crafting needed. It generates them in a JS file named
>> ProjectNa
asjsc does not generate an index.html file, so you must be looking at the
output of mxmlc.
Today, asjsc outputs a JS file that lists the dependencies, as I described.
They're the exact same addDependency() calls that you'd see in mxmlc's
index.html.
- Josh
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:06 PM, OmPraka
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/5/16, 9:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> >
> >On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I don't understand. If you customize your index.html.template, how
> >>does
> >> it matter if the app.html file gets des
On Jan 5, 2016 9:36 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
> asjsc still generates all of the addDependency() calls required for a
debug
> build. No hand crafting needed. It generates them in a JS file named
> ProjectName-dependencies.js. Not coincidentally, that is the only JS file
> that you need to refere
On 1/5/16, 9:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't understand. If you customize your index.html.template, how
>>does
>> it matter if the app.html file gets destroyed and recreated each time?
>> This is how I have it setup.
>
>I don’
I should add that a "main" class shouldn't necessarily be required to have
a static method as its entry point. A developer might prefer to instantiate
it with the constructor instead.
A FlexJS framework app can (and should!) be opinionated, but asjsc needs to
be flexible, as a more generic transpi
On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
> I don't understand. If you customize your index.html.template, how does
> it matter if the app.html file gets destroyed and recreated each time?
> This is how I have it setup.
I don’t remember. Possibly I did things wrong in the past
asjsc still generates all of the addDependency() calls required for a debug
build. No hand crafting needed. It generates them in a JS file named
ProjectName-dependencies.js. Not coincidentally, that is the only JS file
that you need to reference in a script tag in your HTML when running the
debug b
On Jan 5, 2016 3:03 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> It’s not just for instant gratification. (and I do agree that first
impressions are really important)
>
> In the ideal world, the template HTML file can be modified. The primary
reason I have not historically modified the HTML template file is because
cle
It’s not just for instant gratification. (and I do agree that first impressions
are really important)
In the ideal world, the template HTML file can be modified. The primary reason
I have not historically modified the HTML template file is because cleaning a
project (which I do regularly in Fla
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Well, the compiler could be upgraded to process a template like Flash
> Builder currently does. I'm curious to know how many folks use Flash
> Builder and/or Ant tasks to process the html templates for SWFs vs
> plugging in some custom thing in
I use FB for browser based apps but I dislike how it overwrites the
template when switching SDK versions. IIRC FB hard codes the template to
"index.template.html". So it always gets overwritten. I think it should
come with a default template file but let you specify your own template
through a comp
Well, the compiler could be upgraded to process a template like Flash
Builder currently does. I'm curious to know how many folks use Flash
Builder and/or Ant tasks to process the html templates for SWFs vs
plugging in some custom thing in their workflow.
But IMO, the main reason to have an option
I should add that I'm not opposed to adding some kind of optional flag to
asjsc that tells it to generate an HTML file similar to how mxmlc does it.
That HTML file just doesn't seem especially useful to me, as I consider
what it would be like to use asjsc in a real-world project. So I'm trying
to g
Is it actually necessary for the compiler to create some kind of
boilerplate HTML for you? It may be a little useful for quick demos, I'll
concede, but many real world projects will need highly customized HTML
files. Many need things like analytics, CSS, and other static HTML content
that isn't pur
On 1/4/16, 5:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> If you diff asjsc vs mxmlc you'll see the difference.
>>
>
>This is the difference I see:
>
>asjsc: -js-output-type=jsc
>-external-library-path="$SCRIPT_HOM
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> If you diff asjsc vs mxmlc you'll see the difference.
>
This is the difference I see:
asjsc: -js-output-type=jsc
-external-library-path="$SCRIPT_HOME/../libs/js.swc"
mxmlc: -js-output-type=FLEXJS
-sdk-js-lib="$FLEX_HOME/frameworks/js/FlexJS/
If you diff asjsc vs mxmlc you'll see the difference.
IMO, I wouldn't call a new script mxmlcnpm because others may want an auto
generated hmtl as well. Give it a more generic name.
-Alex
On 1/4/16, 4:28 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>I think I get it.
>
>I t
I think I get it.
I thought that the source code for js.swc was in
$FLEX_HOME/frameworks/js/FlexJS/src.
I guess that is not true?
The original problem was that asjsc does not create the index.html file. I
was asked to use mxmlc for that. (Refer to the npm install flexjs thread)
When I used the
On 1/4/16, 4:09 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>In the flexjs/js/bin/mxmlc script, I see that we are referencing the '
>*/frameworks/js/FlexJS/src*' folder.
This folder is intended as the place for folks to put monkey-patched JS
files so they can override the J
In the flexjs/js/bin/mxmlc script, I see that we are referencing the '
*/frameworks/js/FlexJS/src*' folder.
java $VMARGS $D32 $SETUP_SH_VMARGS -Dflexcompiler="$FALCON_HOME"
-Dflexlib="$FLEX_HOME/frameworks" -jar "$SCRIPT_HOME/../lib/mxmlc.jar"
+flexlib="$FLEX_HOME/frameworks" -js-output-type=FLEXJ
24 matches
Mail list logo
