Just a heads up on Pootle. I know it creates .properties files. I use it
for my own projects. The biggest pitfall I ran into was hooking it up to
mysql. I missed setting the db type to utf8_bin, and it took me hours of
debugging to find that was the problem. Other than that one caveat, it was
a eas
On 13/02/2014 04:38, Alex Harui wrote:
TomChi said he'd do it. He usually does his emails on the dev list while
I'm sleeping. If he hasn't done it or given an eta by the time I get
going tomorrow I'll do it. I'll try to make sure it is done before I
think you usually get started.
I've built ou
On 2/12/14 8:32 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> It would be nice if folks could translate a few more locales. Maybe
>>I'll give pootle a shot.
>When I looked at it I don't think it produces files in the format we need
>but certainly worth another look.
>
>> But technically those don't ha
Hi,
> It would be nice if folks could translate a few more locales. Maybe I'll
> give pootle a shot.
When I looked at it I don't think it produces files in the format we need but
certainly worth another look.
> But technically those don't have to hold up an SDK release.
But you want to vote o
Well, I've checked in enough stuff to the Installer that don't think I
have anything else on my list. It would be nice if folks could translate
a few more locales. Maybe I'll give pootle a shot. And hopefully Om will
have a chance to make icons for FlexJS and Falcon. But technically those
don't
In the release4.12.0 branch, IMO.
On 2/11/14 4:34 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>On 10/02/2014 10:46, Justin Mclean wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> In the read me, I think we should point Linux users at the ant-based
>>>install process, I think the relevant Ant tasks are all on the main
>>>branch now ?
>> Any
On 10/02/2014 10:46, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
In the read me, I think we should point Linux users at the ant-based install
process, I think the relevant Ant tasks are all on the main branch now ?
Any chance you could provide a patch/commit the changes yourself?
Not a problem - which git bra
-Able to build sdk.
-Able to compile small project.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:36 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Apache Flex 4.12 RC1
Hi,
I've just made a RC1 of Apache Flex 4.12.0. It c
On 2/10/14 3:13 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Because I hope to release the installer soon for FlexJS.
>Which id dependant on the 4.12 SDK how?
I'd like 4.12 to use the new code paths and that requires changes to
installer.xml and .properties files that should go in the release kits.
>
Hi,
> Because I hope to release the installer soon for FlexJS.
Which id dependant on the 4.12 SDK how?
> Gee, I hope it isn't several weeks.
It's new software only casually tested by a few people. The installer works on
multiple platforms and in multiple languages and is the main vector for how
On 2/10/14 2:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> So, I think it is less total work for us to scramble to get the new
>> installer out before we ship 4.12, otherwise a 4.12.1 is almost
>>guaranteed
>> and that seems like more work.
>Why do we need a 4.12.1? Why not just integrate the install
HI,
> So, I think it is less total work for us to scramble to get the new
> installer out before we ship 4.12, otherwise a 4.12.1 is almost guaranteed
> and that seems like more work.
Why do we need a 4.12.1? Why not just integrate the installer when we do the
next SDK release ie in 3-4 months fo
On 2/9/14 11:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Looks like the last regression issue has been fixed (many thanks to Alex)
>- what else is required when we vote on a RC and finally get 4.12 out
>there? Obviously we need a complete pass of the mustella tests - but is
>there anything else? I kn
Hi,
> In the read me, I think we should point Linux users at the ant-based install
> process, I think the relevant Ant tasks are all on the main branch now ?
Any chance you could provide a patch/commit the changes yourself?
Thanks,
Justin
In the read me, I think we should point Linux users at the ant-based
install process, I think the relevant Ant tasks are all on the main
branch now ?
Tom
On 08/02/2014 04:36, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I've just made a RC1 of Apache Flex 4.12.0. It can be found here in a hour or
two (how long
Hi,
I see mismatch in RSLs names. For example flex-config.xml contains
advancedgrids_4.12.0.2014-02-09_13-31-27.swf
but the file in [Flex SDK]/frameworks/rsls has name
advancedgrids_4.12.0.20140209.swf.
Alexander
On 10.02.2014 11:58, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Looks like the last regression is
Hi,
> I checked in the bug fixes I was working on. Are you going to do a big
> merge at the end or should we merge each change to release4.12.0 to
> develop as we go?
Any changes in release need to be merged back into develop as there where our
tests run. IMO our branching is a little pointless,
Hi,
Looks like the last regression issue has been fixed (many thanks to Alex) -
what else is required when we vote on a RC and finally get 4.12 out there?
Obviously we need a complete pass of the mustella tests - but is there anything
else? I know there a new installer in the works but there no
TES tomorrow as well.
Also tomorrow, I'll start a series of discussions about the new installer.
-Alex
On 2/8/14 2:08 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> "Apache Flex 4.11 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.10. "
>> Should be "Apache Flex 4
>
> The first run of the 'main' suite will be against FP 13 (beta) and the new
> AIR 4 (beta).
>
Well, given the 'mess' I made of things today, that statement no longer is
true :-) But in 2 full runs from now, the 13/4 combo will get it's turn.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat
Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'm adding FP 13 beta and AIR 4 beta to the Mustella VM runs now...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > "Apache Flex 4.11 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.
I'm adding FP 13 beta and AIR 4 beta to the Mustella VM runs now...
EdB
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > "Apache Flex 4.11 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.10. "
> > Should be "Apache Flex 4.12 is a
Hi,
> "Apache Flex 4.11 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.10. "
> Should be "Apache Flex 4.12 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.11. "
>
> "Building Apache Flex 4.11"
> Should be "Building Apache Flex 4.12"
As I said the README
A few notes about the README:
"Apache Flex 4.11 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.10. "
Should be "Apache Flex 4.12 is a follow up release to Apache Flex 4.11. "
"Building Apache Flex 4.11"
Should be "Building Apache Flex 4.12"
Do we still need Pixe
Hi,
> Shouldn't it be "...uses Apache Flex 4.10.0 *or later*" or if it only affects
> 4.10, remove the note?
Yep + fixed.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi
I feel there's an ambiguity in the release notes, known issues...
*Adobe Flash Builder Integration**
**
**Adobe Flash Builder 4.7 and Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 both contain a bug
where, **
**when generating the .mxml file for a new project that uses Apache Flex
4.10.0 **
**and Spark Applicati
Hi,
I've just made a RC1 of Apache Flex 4.12.0. It can be found here in a hour or
two (how long it take to upload) . [1] Once it's uploaded I change the
installer script so it so also get it.
I'm not going to call a VOTE to make this an official release but just want to
make sure everything i
I am more apt to work on a regression than other SDK bugs. But everyone
gets to choose what they work on.
However, you are definitely doing the right thing by making noise for bugs
you want fixed. If you can, add it to FLEX-33952 it will also help keep
it in front of our faces.
-Alex
On 2/5/14
Are regression bugs on a higher priority than other bugs? Just asking
because I found one for the numeric stepper. But it is a regression since
4.6. Just throwing it up there incase it was missed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34054
Chris
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Justin M
HI,
> Also, we need to decide whether we are going to release both Java 6 and
> Java 7 binaries.
I'm still not sure there anything that effects end users, Java 7 can use Java 6
compiled jars right? Do we know if say the Java 7 compiled mxmlc is any fasters
etc? I wouldn't expect any huge diffe
On 2/2/14 6:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We probably have enough fixes and enough time has passed to make a new
>release. There are three regression issues that I can see that would need
>to be fixed before we can do this.
>
>Two relate to datagids and tabbing - anyone how any idea wha
Hi,
We probably have enough fixes and enough time has passed to make a new release.
There are three regression issues that I can see that would need to be fixed
before we can do this.
Two relate to datagids and tabbing - anyone how any idea what changed to cause
these issues?
https://issues.ap
32 matches
Mail list logo
