Concerns like these were also brought up in the discuss and vote in
May/June 2013. We could run another discuss and vote. I noticed in the
prior vote that more than one non-binding vote was cast by folks who are
either now committers and/or PMC members. And it could be that the few
folks who did
Hi,
Are there any committers who are will to get the tests set up in Jenkins, and
answer any user questions and apply any patches we get?
From a quick look there’s only one copyright owner and no bundled code which
makes it easier to accept and potentially no changes to license/notice. Have we
+1
r/s
-Mark Kessler
Senior Program Analyst
MCICOM G4
Phone: (571) 256-7089
Email: mark.kessler@usmc.mil
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 12:46 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Adopting Swiz
Hi,
As I mentioned
+1
2015-12-03 21:54 GMT+01:00 Margo Powell :
> Me too!+1
>
> > From: developer...@gmail.com
> > Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:11:06 +
> > Subject: Re: Adopting Swiz
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > I love swiz +1!
> >
> > 2015-12-03 17:46
Me too!+1
> From: developer...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:11:06 +
> Subject: Re: Adopting Swiz
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> I love swiz +1!
>
> 2015-12-03 17:46 GMT+00:00 Alex Harui :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I mentioned in the "A
I love swiz +1!
2015-12-03 17:46 GMT+00:00 Alex Harui :
> Hi,
>
> As I mentioned in the "Adopting AS3Commons" discussion, the Software Grant
> process is not always required to accept a code base under the Apache
> License.
>
> Over two years ago, we voted to accept the "donation" of the Swiz
> f
Hi,
As I mentioned in the "Adopting AS3Commons" discussion, the Software Grant
process is not always required to accept a code base under the Apache
License.
Over two years ago, we voted to accept the "donation" of the Swiz
framework. The donation was never completed because the donor never
comp
