local/com/ad
obe/flash/framework/playerglobal/11.9/
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:51
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
The Apache Flex bits don't have third-party stuff i
ric THOMAS" wrote:
>Bad luck here too :(
>
>Thanks,
>-Fred
>
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
&g
Bad luck here too :(
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 22:46
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Hi,
> Isn't there some repo on Apache hardware whe
Hi,
> Isn't there some repo on Apache hardware where the Apache Flex bits should
> live?
Yes but it doesn't allow hosting of 3rd party stuff in releases. [1]
Justin
1.http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html#thirdparty
See, told you I'm out of my area ;-)
On 10/29/13 10:54 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is
>>in
>>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
> wrote:
>
> >Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in
> >contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have the
> >fdk deployed somewhere r
On 10/29/13 1:29 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
>Well I doubt it would be possible to Setup protected Areas as this is in
>contrast to the "public-repo" idea. But I would still prefer to have the
>fdk deployed somewhere reliable. I know in our Business things Change
>quite fast I wouldn
"
>
>So this Looks extremely positive :-) *amreallyexitedaboutthis*
>
>
>Von: Miguel Ferreira [miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 10:42
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Insta
quot;
>
> So this Looks extremely positive :-) *amreallyexitedaboutthis*
>
>
> Von: Miguel Ferreira [miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 10:42
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality
l.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 10:42
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
That will be perfect and really really useful.
Miguel
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 2
That will be perfect and really really useful.
Miguel
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:17:26 +0100
> Subject: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
> I just signed up to the Mailinglist and sent an inq
nstag, 29. Oktober 2013 10:01
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
If I knew how/what, I would contact Sonotype.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofe
gt; To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:47:27 -0700
> Subject: Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
>
>
> On 10/28/13 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> Until now, the problem was we couldn't host the SDK in a
MAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 19:48
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
> > Well at sonatype they do distinguish between SNAPSHOT and Release
> Versions. So the process of updating SNA
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 19:48
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
> Well at sonatype they do distinguish between SNAPSHOT and Release
Versions. So the process of updating SNAPSHOTS is far les
[jus...@classsoftware.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 23:46
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Hi,
> Until now, the problem was we couldn't host the SDK in a public repo because
> it would let those who download it, to download the thi
On 10/28/13 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Until now, the problem was we couldn't host the SDK in a public repo
>>because
>> it would let those who download it, to download the third-party as well
>> without accept the Adobe licenses
>
>Hate to say this but but just because you accep
Hi,
> Until now, the problem was we couldn't host the SDK in a public repo because
> it would let those who download it, to download the third-party as well
> without accept the Adobe licenses
Hate to say this but but just because you accept the licences doesn't mean you
can host the binaries pu
Hopefully I'll be soon in England and improve my English :-)
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 20:34
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Hi Alex,
&
lundi 28 octobre 2013 17:19
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
As usual, I'm not sure I understand Maven and Maven-izing, so apologies if
I'm way off base:
IIRC, the Mavenizer's main goal is to install Adobe and other third-par
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 16:22
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Well at sonatype they do distinguish between SNAPSHOT and Release Versions.
So the process of updating SNAPSHOTS is far less complicated than that of
deploying Releases. But
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
>Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 16:07
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: RE: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
>Chris,
>
>Do you think Sonatype w
]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 16:07
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Chris,
Do you think Sonatype would allows the creation of specific user granted to
download the SDK ? It would be nice but I'm not sure, plus I would need to deal
8 Oct 2013 14:18:50 +0100
> Subject: AW: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
> Well in that case, I would opt for creating an Apache Flex account at
> sonatype and to Stage and Deploy stuff there ... (The way Velo did it) ... I
> guess there is legally no real difference
[webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 13:42
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
You're right, that's my exp too but from the company I'm working for at the
moment, this is the only way as the installer doesn't work fr
time :-)
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:18:48 +0100
> Subject: AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
> But from my experiance it is usually more difficult to convince the
> Company-Repo admins
developer, but by one Special Person
> that is permitted to do so.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 10:53
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: Add Mavenizer funct
Person that is
permitted to do so.
Chris
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 10:53
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
1- I'm short of time at the moment and th
te more accurately how many SDKs it can serve.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
> Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:17
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
month of run,
I'll be able to estimate more accurately how many SDKs it can serve.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:17
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Still I can't really see what would be the Problem to add the mavenizer to
the Installer? I guess this would resolve any legal Pr
christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Still I can't really see what would be the Problem to add the mavenizer to
the Installer? I guess this would resolve any legal Problems. I do see some
Maj
er to the installer still
seems to be the best Option from my Point of view.
Chris
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 10:17
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Hi J
an give access to PMCs who ask me.
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:03
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Hi,
> From the Installer, users already have t
Hi,
> From the Installer, users already have to accept licenses for the third
> party artifacts, for those users I can grant access to a online maven repo
> which serves the Mavenized SDKs
What to stop users sharing that URL and/or user credentials around?
> I can even add the lasts nightly maven
be really apreciated.
Best regards,Miguel Ferreira
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:38:30 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> I maybe found a faster way to give the users a legal access t
d.
Best regards,Miguel Ferreira
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:38:30 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> I maybe found a faster way to give the users a legal access to all the
> mav
ira
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:38:30 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> I maybe found a faster way to give the users a legal access to all the
> mavenized SDKs to use u
Hi,
I maybe found a faster way to give the users a legal access to all the
mavenized SDKs to use used with FlexMojos 6.x:
>From the Installer, users already have to accept licenses for the third
party artifacts, for those users I can grant access to a online maven repo
which serves the Mavenized
RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Why does it need maven 3.4? Currently intellij doesn't work nicely with flex
and maven greater than 3.05 and flashbuilder doesn't work well with maven
at all :-) On 4 Sep 2013 14:16, "Frédéric THOMAS"
wrote:
> @Om, would you be ok
Thanks for telling me, that's a typo, it need Maven 3.0.4 :-)
-Message d'origine-
De : Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 15:28
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Why does it need maven 3.4?
Why does it need maven 3.4? Currently intellij doesn't work nicely with
flex and maven greater than 3.05 and flashbuilder doesn't work well with
maven at all :-)
On 4 Sep 2013 14:16, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> @Om, would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ?
>
> I already did a mo
@Om, would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ?
I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it.
I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side:
- Maven detection
- Process user choice
- Error detection
-Fred
[1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/
lad to help test it on Windows.
Thanks,
Om
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2013 13:46
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
&g
he classifier of another one.
But I can be wrong, someone can confirm ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2013
13:23 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to
Installer
Also I have
com/adobe
e wrong, someone can confirm ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2013 13:23
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Also I have
com/adobe/flex/framework/spark/4.1.0.16076/spark-4.1.0.1607
ed
>> artifacts).
>>
>> Any suggestions ?
>>
>> -Fred
>>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : OmPrakash Muppirala (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
>> Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2013 01:13
>> À : iss...@flex.apache.org
>>
; Any suggestions ?
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OmPrakash Muppirala (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Envoyé : mardi 3 septembre 2013 01:13
> À : iss...@flex.apache.org
> Objet : [jira] [Assigned] (FLEX-33695) Add Mavenizer func
akash Muppirala)
Assigning to Fred as per his request.
> Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
>
>
> Key: FLEX-33695
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33695
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
