Re: AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/29/13 3:06 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >It's not just the pom, but the directory structure and the naming of the >file ... so all of these would have to be adjusted. That might be possible as well, as long as we treat the AIR SDK as a single file and don't have to mess with its

AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Hi Frederic, but that's not quite true ... each maven repo has a root and relative to that the groupId, artifactId and version make up the relative path finished by the file name containing the artifactId, version and classifier. In Flexmojos I handle the config.zip in a way that it is fetched

AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
It's not just the pom, but the directory structure and the naming of the file ... so all of these would have to be adjusted. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 22:46 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: License

Re: AW: AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread Alex Harui
e Nachricht- >Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: AW: License Stuff > > > >On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" > wrote: > >>But if the deal Velo

AW: AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:31 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: License Stuff On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess >this would

Re: AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/29/13 2:02 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >It should be able, but it's not the usual way to go. Think about CI >Servers ... how do you want to handle them? Via some registration key. I think that was actually your idea. Once you accept it stores (somehow) that you accepted and n

AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
e.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Envoyé : mardi 29 octobre 2013 21:14 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : AW: License Stuff But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess this would be all we need and we wouldn't have the hassle of having to implement any sort of m

AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
I gave Brian the Alex' contact. Hopefully Alex will be able to give him the contact he needs to sort this out. It seems easy to ask for the permission to redistribute, but I doubt it will be that easy to actually receive the permission to do so .. so keep your fingers crossed. Chris -Ursp

AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
It should be able, but it's not the usual way to go. Think about CI Servers ... how do you want to handle them? I would like to keep the maven build as normal as possible. Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2013 21:3

Re: AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/29/13 1:13 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" wrote: >But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess this >would be all we need and we wouldn't have the hassle of having to >implement any sort of manual deployment wrapper as I would really hate >having to implement any

AW: License Stuff

2013-10-29 Thread christofer.d...@c-ware.de
But if the deal Velo and Sonatype had with Adobe was enough, I guess this would be all we need and we wouldn't have the hassle of having to implement any sort of manual deployment wrapper as I would really hate having to implement any sort if "interactive" maven build. Chris -Ursprüngliche