On 10/5/16, 8:20 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/5/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>>But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the
>>Ant build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib
>>... we should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't
On 10/5/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>But it doesn't explain why the Maven build builds a lot faster than the
>Ant build. So it can't be a problem that I unpack the entire closure lib
>... we should compare it to the NPM thingy (Don't really know what that's
>doing).
>
>
>I'll have a l
tz
Cc: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
Hi Chris,
I see the arquetype generated pom only refers to one execution. This is an
excerpt form my pom.xml (not notified by me):
compile-javascript
> *Von:* carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 08:39:00
> *An:* dev@flex.apache.org
> *Cc:* Christofer Dutz
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
>
> That sounds to be the problem
I configured the compilation for the examples to build both the swf and the js
version.
Chris
Von: carlos.rov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von Carlos
Rovira
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 08:39:00
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW:
dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
That sounds to be the problem ( as well making 2 builds js+swf at a time)
2016-10-05 1:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
mailto:aha...@adobe.com>>:
On 10/4/16, 2:04 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com<mailto:car
That sounds to be the problem ( as well making 2 builds js+swf at a time)
2016-10-05 1:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>
> On 10/4/16, 2:04 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
>
> wrote:
>
> >Right now, I have maven build as well VSCode/NextGenAS IDE build. Maven is
> >more slow
On 10/4/16, 2:04 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Right now, I have maven build as well VSCode/NextGenAS IDE build. Maven is
>more slow that Josh's (40 sec vs 5 sec for a hello world), I suppose this
>is due to lots of checks maven do. Maybe do you have some conf
On 10/4/16, 1:45 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for fixing it. I hope it helped get a little insight on how maven
>works and that it helps getting comfortable with it.
Yes, it helped me learn a bit more about Maven.
>
>
>One thing though ... if the output is set to a file it adds th
ed up things even
more, we should do that.
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Carlos Rovira
Datum: 04.10.16 23:47 (GMT+01:00)
An: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
I could say that the almost most of the ti
ov...@gmail.com im Auftrag von
> Carlos Rovira
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 22:26:44
> *An:* dev@flex.apache.org
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
>
> Amazing!, it works Alex. Thanks!
>
> I finaly could build my flexjs test project generated with the a
enstag, 4. Oktober 2016 22:26:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
Amazing!, it works Alex. Thanks!
I finaly could build my flexjs test project generated with the archetype
and run it :)
So for me this is a huge milestone for flexjs :D
2016-10-04 20:11 GM
gt; >clean install") or do a "mvn clean install" of the complete compiler
> >project.
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >
> >Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
> >
> >
> > Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----
> >Von: Al
m: 04.10.16 19:00 (GMT+01:00)
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
>
>
>
>On 10/4/16, 9:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>>Well you could override it in the pom, but I don't think that I do that.
>>It should always be the def
.10.16 19:00 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
On 10/4/16, 9:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well you could override it in the pom, but I don't think that I do that.
>It should always be the default defines in the mojo. I only
On 10/4/16, 9:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well you could override it in the pom, but I don't think that I do that.
>It should always be the default defines in the mojo. I only expose config
>options to customize, the default should apply in most cases, especially
>the framework build.
OK.
On 10/4/16, 9:42 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>It looks like the pom.xml files specify the output as well. Can you
>quickly answer if the pom.xml overrides the getOutput in CompileJSMojo?
Wait, never mind. I didn't see it in the pom it was in the generated
compile-js-config.xml. I'll figure it
phone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Alex Harui
Datum: 04.10.16 18:43 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Jenkins still red
On 10/4/16, 9:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>I noticed how late it must have been at you
On 10/4/16, 9:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>I noticed how late it must have been at your end after sending my mail.
>So sorry for that.
>
>I guess I'm just totally frustrated, that I keep on cleaning up stuff,
>and as soon as it's done I have to start again.
IMO, your goal sho
ly simply have to change what you return here.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 16:52:44
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Jenkins still red
On 10/4/16, 3:22 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
&
On 10/4/16, 3:22 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>as you seem to be responding to everything else I guess you missed my
>asking you to rollback your changes and move them to a feature branch.
>Are you going to revert
>
>b8d8c48b11f41ea435eefafc94eb0927229e8a4b
>
>It's ok that it "sli
lf or
write that documentation immediately and I would prefer a little discussion on
what's changed and not having to reverse engineer mentioned commit.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 08:35:33
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff:
I agree ... the Plugin is not broken, but the compiler changed without the
plugin having the chance to be adjusted to those changes.
Yes most of the build logic is in the plugin itself. That's the way things are
done in Maven. If you change the way things are built, you have to adjust the
plug
23 matches
Mail list logo
