gt;different than a normal falcon compile, but using different framework
>libraries. Ist hat correct? If this was the case, I would need one more
>artifact for FalconJX and the set of dependencies for the FlexJX
>libraries.
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
nJX and
the set of dependencies for the FlexJX libraries.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 05:26
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Adding support for FlexJS & FlexJX to Flexmojos
FlexJS has evolved a
FlexJS has evolved a bit and no longer overlays a Flex SDK. The current
install script does borrow some files from a Flex SDK binary package, but
now that i’m thinking about it, that may not be necessary anymore.
I’m not a Maven expert, and haven’t really thought through how it works
with Maven,
Hi Erik,
thanks for the details ;-)
But all is happening in the flex-falcon project. Am I correct?
Here I already created maven artifacts from the "compiler" module, which seems
to be Falcon itself.
Then there are compiler.js and compiler.jx both seem to contain a
org.apache.flex.compiler.clien
It's nothing Maven-Special I'm talking about. It's just some plain old Java jar
dependency thing.
I would like to have FlexJS as an addition to Falcon. So assuming a project
allready has Falcon, by adding the FlexJS jar, the user would be able to use
FlexJS.
I've tried compiling FlexJS several
ache.org
Betreff: AW: Adding support for FlexJS & FlexJX to Flexmojos
So how would I setup this scenario?
I have a flexjs-compiler jar artifact that has dependencies on
falcon-compiler.jar?
Would I add an additional flexjs-compiler artifact to the rest and somehow tell
Flexmojos which compiler
So how would I setup this scenario?
I have a flexjs-compiler jar artifact that has dependencies on
falcon-compiler.jar?
Would I add an additional flexjs-compiler artifact to the rest and somehow tell
Flexmojos which compiler implementation class it should use? Having a look at
the code, I think
