HI,
well I'm not talking about taking EXTERNC out of compiler.jx into a dedicated,
package. I'm talking about taking the Integration-Tests that rely on parts of
compiler.jx being built into a dedicated testsuite artifact. I think EXTERNC is
ok to be kept where it is.
I am worried about yet ano
On 3/14/16, 8:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I'm actually currently looking at the unmodified ANT build in develop.
>Here I can see that the extern JavaScript stuff in GCL is checked in. The
>build.xml in line contains this block:
>
>
>failonerror="false">
Hi,
I would prefer to stay in the Java world for now ;-)
Chris
Von: Josh Tynjala
Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 16:09
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX
0.6.0
dts2as pretty much does the
: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX
0.6.0
On 3/13/16, 1:08 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Thanks for the explanation :-)
>
>And what's actually happening in GCL? Here I can see a whole bunch of
>JavaScript files as well as matching ActionScript sources. Here the
&g
On 3/13/16, 1:08 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Thanks for the explanation :-)
>
>And what's actually happening in GCL? Here I can see a whole bunch of
>JavaScript files as well as matching ActionScript sources. Here the
>out/as sort of contains the same classes as the src directory, but the
>on
Thanks for the explanation :-)
And what's actually happening in GCL? Here I can see a whole bunch of
JavaScript files as well as matching ActionScript sources. Here the out/as sort
of contains the same classes as the src directory, but the ones in the src
contain Apache headers and some imports
Hehe ... and I was confused why the mails kept sicking to my inbox and didn't
move to the Flex folder ;-)
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 15:20
An: Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJ
