Oh ... is VF2JS still valid? I thought this approach was dropped?
If it's still valid I guess there will be more work coming towars us, as I
remember the two sort of having mixed up static variables ... they sort of
share some parts of state ...
Oh well ... better not think of this right now ...
dentials I need to log in.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2015 23:19
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FLEXJS][FALCONJX] Builds and CI (was Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
On
On 10/7/15, 1:40 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>As it does seem that there is a little bad blood, let me please take care
>of this personally.
>I know that Gavin is currently still on his way back to Austrailia and
>will probably arrive tomorrow.
>I'll ping him in one or two days.
You are more
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
On 10/7/15, 2:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>A lot can be achieved if you can actually grab someone and have a beer
>with him ... that's why I like ApacheCons ;-)
No argument about that.
Did you happen to find out why they told us
On 10/7/15, 2:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>A lot can be achieved if you can actually grab someone and have a beer
>with him ... that's why I like ApacheCons ;-)
No argument about that.
Did you happen to find out why they told us “no” earlier and now “yes”? I
would hate for the answer to
On 10/7/15, 4:05 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>As long as I have to disable tests in order to run a build, this is a
>blocker for me ... sorry :-(
>I won't accept any informal "well first do this, then do that, then
>things will work" people should be able to download the source release,
>unpac
Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
On 10/6/15, 12:04 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Yes it would be a separate repo ... as you could run the "testsuite"
>against falcon without wanting to have the sdk or vice versa and this
>would destroy t
nd CI (was Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
Hi,
> I cannot find any record in my emails of what error you hit. Can you try
> the latest nightly source package and provide more details?
I’ll give it a go when I get some time.
> Unfortunately, when I last ask
Hi,
> I cannot find any record in my emails of what error you hit. Can you try
> the latest nightly source package and provide more details?
I’ll give it a go when I get some time.
> Unfortunately, when I last asked, Infra said they can no longer give us an
> Azure box.
As mentioned in another
On 10/6/15, 1:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Part of the voting +1 on a release is that a PMC member must be able to
>compile it. [1] Currently that’s not the case for me, although I’ve not
>tried
>the latest dev branch.
I cannot find any record in my emails of what error you hit. Can you try
Hi,
> No objection here. What do others think? I thought it was a common
> practice to put tests in the same repo as the code
In my experience unit tests yes, integration tests not always.
> How will it help the vast majority of folks who just want to use the latest
> code? Create a branch an
On 10/6/15, 12:04 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Yes it would be a separate repo ... as you could run the "testsuite"
>against falcon without wanting to have the sdk or vice versa and this
>would destroy the circle (at least one of them).
No objection here. What do others think? I thought i
5 08:37
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FLEXJS][FALCONJX] Builds and CI (was Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
Renaming the thread to match the earlier fork.
On 10/5/15, 10:34 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well ... as you asked the question ... ;-)
>
>
Renaming the thread to match the earlier fork.
On 10/5/15, 10:34 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well ... as you asked the question ... ;-)
>
>A real test should be independent of the implementation it tests. So if
>in both cases (mxml and falcon) the same testsuite should be used. Only
>this way
cts) ;-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 23:55
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
On 10/5/15, 2:46 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Regarding the bina
On 10/5/15, 2:46 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Regarding the binaries ... I was refering to downloading the binaries
>from the flex-sdk that the build seems to be relying on. Not any
>resources from flex-asjs ... I doubt that the asjs+falcon bundle should
>require "dynamic updates" from the fle
ow ... now it's time for bed for me :-)
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 23:18
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
On 10/5/15, 2:00 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
On 10/5/15, 2:00 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>So flex-falcon relys on flex-asjs for tests and flex-asjs relys on
>flex-falcon and flex-falcon relys on flex-sdk ... Hmmm
And flex-sdk relies on flex-tlf and flex-blazeds, IIRC.
>You know how it sounds now having to delete the flex-sdk in order
So flex-falcon relys on flex-asjs for tests and flex-asjs relys on flex-falcon
and flex-falcon relys on flex-sdk ... hmmm
You know how it sounds now having to delete the flex-sdk in order for the
flex-asjs to download some binary deps, to reuse?
Why not directly rely the flex-asjs on these binary
19 matches
Mail list logo
