>
> Oh ... is VF2JS still valid? I thought this approach was dropped?
>
Both can be true, I'm afraid.
I created VF2JS to leverage the power of the Flex SDK but allow for
publication to JS in case Flash wasn't an option. I delayed work on it to
help out with the development of FlexJS. And I think
t now ... refactoring the build to be
sef-sufficient should be a great thing. Thanks for working on this.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 15:31
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache F
On 10/9/15, 12:58 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>It would be great if you could split the tests up in unit-test and
>integration-test.
>This way the unit-tests could be executed every time and the
>integration-tests once every day.
>
>Just give us targets to build with unit-tests but without
>in
It would be great if you could split the tests up in unit-test and
integration-test.
This way the unit-tests could be executed every time and the integration-tests
once every day.
Just give us targets to build with unit-tests but without integration-tests and
we should be fine.
Chris
dentials I need to log in.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2015 23:19
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FLEXJS][FALCONJX] Builds and CI (was Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
On
On 10/7/15, 1:40 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>As it does seem that there is a little bad blood, let me please take care
>of this personally.
>I know that Gavin is currently still on his way back to Austrailia and
>will probably arrive tomorrow.
>I'll ping him in one or two days.
You are more
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
On 10/7/15, 2:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>A lot can be achieved if you can actually grab someone and have a beer
>with him ... that's why I like ApacheCons ;-)
No argument about that.
Did you happen to find out why they told us
On 10/7/15, 2:07 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>A lot can be achieved if you can actually grab someone and have a beer
>with him ... that's why I like ApacheCons ;-)
No argument about that.
Did you happen to find out why they told us “no” earlier and now “yes”? I
would hate for the answer to
On 10/7/15, 4:05 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>As long as I have to disable tests in order to run a build, this is a
>blocker for me ... sorry :-(
>I won't accept any informal "well first do this, then do that, then
>things will work" people should be able to download the source release,
>unpac
Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
On 10/6/15, 12:04 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Yes it would be a separate repo ... as you could run the "testsuite"
>against falcon without wanting to have the sdk or vice versa and this
>would destroy t
nd CI (was Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
Hi,
> I cannot find any record in my emails of what error you hit. Can you try
> the latest nightly source package and provide more details?
I’ll give it a go when I get some time.
> Unfortunately, when I last ask
Hi,
> I cannot find any record in my emails of what error you hit. Can you try
> the latest nightly source package and provide more details?
I’ll give it a go when I get some time.
> Unfortunately, when I last asked, Infra said they can no longer give us an
> Azure box.
As mentioned in another
On 10/6/15, 1:21 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Part of the voting +1 on a release is that a PMC member must be able to
>compile it. [1] Currently that’s not the case for me, although I’ve not
>tried
>the latest dev branch.
I cannot find any record in my emails of what error you hit. Can you try
Hi,
> No objection here. What do others think? I thought it was a common
> practice to put tests in the same repo as the code
In my experience unit tests yes, integration tests not always.
> How will it help the vast majority of folks who just want to use the latest
> code? Create a branch an
On 10/6/15, 12:04 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Yes it would be a separate repo ... as you could run the "testsuite"
>against falcon without wanting to have the sdk or vice versa and this
>would destroy the circle (at least one of them).
No objection here. What do others think? I thought i
5 08:37
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FLEXJS][FALCONJX] Builds and CI (was Re: AW: AW: AW: AW:
[DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0)
Renaming the thread to match the earlier fork.
On 10/5/15, 10:34 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well ... as you asked the question ... ;-)
>
>
Renaming the thread to match the earlier fork.
On 10/5/15, 10:34 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well ... as you asked the question ... ;-)
>
>A real test should be independent of the implementation it tests. So if
>in both cases (mxml and falcon) the same testsuite should be used. Only
>this way
cts) ;-)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 23:55
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
On 10/5/15, 2:46 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Regarding the bina
On 10/5/15, 2:46 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Regarding the binaries ... I was refering to downloading the binaries
>from the flex-sdk that the build seems to be relying on. Not any
>resources from flex-asjs ... I doubt that the asjs+falcon bundle should
>require "dynamic updates" from the fle
ow ... now it's time for bed for me :-)
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 23:18
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
On 10/5/15, 2:00 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
On 10/5/15, 2:00 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>So flex-falcon relys on flex-asjs for tests and flex-asjs relys on
>flex-falcon and flex-falcon relys on flex-sdk ... Hmmm
And flex-sdk relies on flex-tlf and flex-blazeds, IIRC.
>You know how it sounds now having to delete the flex-sdk in order
binary resources? By doing this,
you would remove the circles.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 22:56
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
Thanks for trying. Those are flex-sdk errors. Do you
But it seems the failures in "compiler.jx.tests" have been fixed by recent
updates.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 22:47
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
So I updated b
Thanks for trying. Those are flex-sdk errors. Do you have the right set
of flex-sdk swcs ready when you run the Falcon build? I assume you are
working from the repos and not from the build output? Maybe try this:
1) remove all working copies except flex-asjs
2) in the flex-asjs folder, run ‘an
So I updated both falcon and asjs and rebuilt with "ant clean" and "ant all"
... unfortunately the build still fails with the same tests. So I gave building
asjs a go "ant clean" and then "ant all" and then re-ran "ant clean" and "ant
all" again on falcon. Still the same error:
[junit] Runn
What are the failures?
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Christofer Dutz
Date: Sat, Sep 26, 2015 9:23 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
I am having 2 Failures in the testsuite (HEAD) ... ist this e
I am having 2 Failures in the testsuite (HEAD) ... ist this expected?
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. September 2015 08:50
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
Hi,
Looks like FlexJSStore is back in working
On 9/24/15, 11:54 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Same as with Falcon ... want me to stage the artifacts for release in the
>maven repo?
Same answer ;-)
Thanks for helping out,
-Alex
Same as with Falcon ... want me to stage the artifacts for release in the maven
repo?
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 25. September 2015 08:50
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0
Hi,
Looks
29 matches
Mail list logo
