> From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 bugbase
>
>> I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>> that you're referring to
o:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:52 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 bugbase
OK. Do you know if you or I can get notifications of new bugs filed? I didn't
see any way to sign up on the bugbase site.
On 1/16/13 12:40 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrot
don
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:35 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 bugbase
>
>
>
>
> On 1/16/13 11:24 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
> wrote:
>
uot; and include a the note in the report
that the bug is in ASC 2. Ugh.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:35 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 bugbase
On 1/16/13 11:24 AM, "Michael A. Labri
On 1/16/13 11:24 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> But the logistical question is: Should we automatically bring over every
>> change for every bug? Or just selected bugs?
>> I would strongly prefer that we don't automatically copy the ASC 2.0 bug base
>> over to Apache Flex, especially by
>But the logistical question is: Should we automatically bring over every
>change for every bug? Or just selected bugs?
>I would strongly prefer that we don't automatically copy the ASC 2.0 bug base
>over to Apache Flex, especially by scraping.
Just to clarify, I didn't suggest that. I sugge
ry to follow up on this issue.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:13 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 bugbase
>I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there
On 1/16/13 11:13 AM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>> that you're referring to?
>
> See below:
>
> On 10/17/12 11:04 PM, "Clint Modien" wrote:
>
>> This obviously begs the questionŠ does Adobe plan on donating an
>I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>that you're referring to?
Also, for good measure:
---
"We have no plans keeping ASC 2.0 (and above) in sync with Falcon, as I said
previously, today the compilers are different projects and targeting two
different a
>I don't remember anyone from Adobe saying that. Is there a particular email
>that you're referring to?
See below:
On 10/17/12 11:04 PM, "Clint Modien" wrote:
>This obviously begs the questionŠ does Adobe plan on donating any changes to
>ASC 2.0 back to Apache Flex?
---
>Hi Clint,
>
>No, w
the moment.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Roland Zwaga [mailto:rol...@stackandheap.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:36 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: ASC 2.0 bugbase
Hello gentlemen,
I guess we'll have to find some way to monitor the Adobe bugbase for ASC
2.0 since Ado
>I guess that's a way to do it, but we'd also run the risk of releasing the
>wrath of Adobe. Now, I know that you and me personally wouldn't lose much
>sleep over this, but we do have to >consider Apache Flex as a neutral entity
>in all of this. Right?
I say we ask forgiveness and not permissi
On 16 January 2013 16:51, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
> >Hello gentlemen,
> (p.s. you brute there are women here too)
>
Damn, for once you're right. Next time I'll open with 'Hello ladies,
gentlemen and Mike'.
My apologies to all the women on the list, apparently I am a closeted
sexist without rea
>Hello gentlemen,
(p.s. you brute there are women here too)
>I guess we'll have to find some way to monitor the Adobe bugbase for ASC
>2.0 since Adobe has indicated that they will not donate any patches for ASC
>2.0 to Apache.
>For instance, I'm sure this issue needs to be fixed in Falcon as wel
Hello gentlemen,
I guess we'll have to find some way to monitor the Adobe bugbase for ASC
2.0 since Adobe has indicated that they will
not donate any patches for ASC 2.0 to Apache.
For instance, I'm sure this issue needs to be fixed in Falcon as well:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bu
15 matches
Mail list logo
