+1
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> +1
>
> I'm sure it's the best solution, but it still hurts my head the way we have
> to do all that to hook back into our current process.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> wrote:
>
> > Bump...
> >
>
+1
I'm sure it's the best solution, but it still hurts my head the way we have
to do all that to hook back into our current process.
-Mark
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:09 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Bump...
>
Bump...
Good catch! Fixed in the wiki page.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A nit - shouldn't "The list moderator for comm...@apache.org" actually be
> "A list moderator for comm...@flex.apache.org"
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 12:57 PM, OmPrakas
+1
Harbs
Hi,
A nit - shouldn't "The list moderator for comm...@apache.org" actually be "A
list moderator for comm...@flex.apache.org"
Regards,
Dave
On May 21, 2013, at 12:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the proposal [1]
>
> Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
>
> Please vote as follows:
3 at 3:27 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> > wrote:
> > > +1 indeed and good one btw
> > >
> > > -Fred
> > >
> > > -Message d'origine- From: OmPrakash Muppirala
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 9:57 PM
> > > To: dev@flex.apach
> -Fred
> >
> > -Message d'origine- From: OmPrakash Muppirala
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 9:57 PM
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Use GitHub based Whiteboard
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the proposal
t; To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Use GitHub based Whiteboard
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the proposal [1]
>
> Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
>
> Please vote as follows:
>
> +1 (Approve)
> -1 (Don't approve) with a reason
> 0 (Don't care)
>
+1 indeed and good one btw
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: OmPrakash Muppirala
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 9:57 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Use GitHub based Whiteboard
Hi,
Here is the proposal [1]
Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
Please vote as follows:
+1 (Approv
+1 ... Thank you Om.
On 22.05.2013, at 03:57, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the proposal [1]
>
> Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
>
> Please vote as follows:
>
> +1 (Approve)
> -1 (Don't approve) with a reason
> 0 (Don't care)
>
> Also denote binding if you are a PMC member.
>
>
+1 (binding)
On 5/21/13 12:57 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Here is the proposal [1]
>
>Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
>
>Please vote as follows:
>
>+1 (Approve)
>-1 (Don't approve) with a reason
>0 (Don't care)
>
>Also denote binding if you are a PMC member.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Om
>
+1
--
Jose Barragan
Chief Software Architect
Codeoscopic Madrid
C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92.
Planta 5. 505.
28020 Madrid.
Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
On May 21, 2013, at 10:10 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for figuring this out, Om!
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:5
+1 (binding)
Thanks for figuring this out, Om!
EdB
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:57 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the proposal [1]
>
> Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
>
> Please vote as follows:
>
> +1 (Approve)
> -1 (Don't approve) with a reason
> 0 (Don't care)
>
> Also denote b
Hi,
Here is the proposal [1]
Here is [DISCUSS] thread [2]
Please vote as follows:
+1 (Approve)
-1 (Don't approve) with a reason
0 (Don't care)
Also denote binding if you are a PMC member.
Thanks in advance,
Om
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Proposal+-+Github+based+White
15 matches
Mail list logo
