+1
Package
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1002/org/a
pache/flex/flex-tool-api/1.0.0/flex-tool-api-1.0.0-source-release.zip
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok:
Hi,
I just dropped the RC2 staging repo and created a new one RC3
(orgapacheflex-1002) which should contain all the pom-fixes we recently
discussed. Now the README is fixed and all assembly descriptors have Apache
headers.
You can have a look at the staging repo at:
https://repository.apache.
Hi,
I just dropped the RC1 staging repo and created a new one RC2
(orgapacheflex-1001) which should contain all the pom-fixes we recently
discussed. Now the README is fixed as well as the scm section in the pom. Also
the tags should now match niceley.
I'm carrying over the votes of RC1:
al
+0 Binding.
Lets get in the latest changes because we want to release this only once.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +0 until issues in discussion are sorted, while none are probably
> blockers, the version control path being incorrect may cause issu
Hi,
+0 until issues in discussion are sorted, while none are probably blockers, the
version control path being incorrect may cause issues. Given this is not going
to be released often, may be best to fix this now?
Thanks,
Justin
Done.
And: +1 (binding)
EdB
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I didn’t add it to the RAT excludes, but it appears to be a notice file
> like README, RELEASE_NOTES, CONTRIBUTING, etc, so I think it is ok. Feel
> free to add it to the RAT excludes.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/13/1
: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex Tool API 1.0.0
I didn’t add it to the RAT excludes, but it appears to be a notice file
like README, RELEASE_NOTES, CONTRIBUTING, etc, so I think it is ok. Feel
free to add it to the RAT excludes.
-Alex
On 11/13/14, 9:14 PM, "Eri
+1 (binding)
I wasn't able to build project using approve script, but It's build without
it. Everything except that looks good!
Great job Chris!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Re
I didn’t add it to the RAT excludes, but it appears to be a notice file
like README, RELEASE_NOTES, CONTRIBUTING, etc, so I think it is ok. Feel
free to add it to the RAT excludes.
-Alex
On 11/13/14, 9:14 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Depending on if someone can explain the meaning of this and w
Depending on if someone can explain the meaning of this and why I'm seeing
this and why it is/is not a problem, I intend to vote +1 (binding) as well:
***
Unapproved licenses:
/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-utilities/flex-tool-api/flex-tool-api-1.0.0-sourc
Hi Chris,
+1 (binding)
Looks good, especially for a first time releasing Apache Flex stuff.
Couple of things:
1) The artifacts are not viewable from the browser. The browser just
serves the pom.xml file. But they are there and the approval scripts get
them.
2) The script couldn’t find your k
Hi,
I just staged a first release candidate of the Apache Flex Tool API 1.0.0 at
Apaches maven staging repository.
The Flex Tool API is a simple set of generally two interfaces which allows it
to easily use the Flex tools (most prominent one: the compiler) to be used by
external tools (Mainl
12 matches
Mail list logo