Try:
$ git branch --all
My output is:
* develop
master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/develop
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/patches
remotes/origin/release4.9
This shows that my current branch is "develop" and that I have a local master
branch, and all th
Try:
$ git branch --all
My output is:
* develop
master
remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
remotes/origin/develop
remotes/origin/master
remotes/origin/patches
remotes/origin/release4.9
This shows that my current branch is "develop" and that I have a local master
branch, and all th
Thanks Erik.
Okay, it looks like we have a consensus and frankly, I dont want to prolong
this limbo anymore.
I will be giving the go-ahead for making the sdk and tlf git repos
read-write now.
Before we open the flood gates, perhaps committers should write to a test
file first?
*Also, all commit
he.org
> Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
> wrote:
>
>> Just did some checks:
>>
>> - master and develop branch history -> ok
>> - build sdk / other locales -&g
That's a go for me.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Om
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 6:52 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
wrote:
Just did some checks:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Just did some checks:
>
> - master and develop branch history -> ok
> - build sdk / other locales -> ok
> - mustella checkintests -> ok
>
> Is there some obvious checks to do that I would have missed ?
>
> -Fred
>
Cool, thanks for checkin
Just did some checks:
- master and develop branch history -> ok
- build sdk / other locales -> ok
- mustella checkintests -> ok
Is there some obvious checks to do that I would have missed ?
-Fred
, I'm
> testing git right now.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Jose Barragan
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 7:30 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
>
>
> I'm c
+ svn r/w, I was away (I also need a social life), I'm
testing git right now.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Jose Barragan
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 7:30 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NEED ACTION] Git migration - SDK git repo ready for testing
I'm cl
I'm cloning right now, too.
@Alex, the missing empty folders, seems normal, because Git don't track folders
just only files. In case we need it, it's necessary include a dummy file like
".dummy" or whatever other dummy name.
--
Jose Barragan
Software Architect Chief
Codeoscopic Madrid
C/. Infa
I did a folder diff of the develop branch. Except for the line endings on
a few files everything else is identical.
We have 3 people who have tested SDK now. Anyone else around testing the
git repos?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Om wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Ale
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hmm. I just noticed that the Git flex-sdk is just trunk and no branches.
> Same for Git flex-tlf. Just its trunk and no branches.
>
>
Your git directory will show the trunk (i.e. master) by default. I checked
the git log and I do see develop
Hi,
> I am fine with that. How long do you think we should wait.
I give it at least 12 hours unless enough people take a detailed look at it.
I've had a quick glance and the SDK history seems fine but I've not checked out
the file and done a MD5 check on all of them.
> The weekend is upon is
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> > I will have this thread open for 4 hours.
> Due to time zones and that some people may asleep right now I'd suggest we
> leave it open for longer than 4 hours.
>
> Justin
>
>
I am fine with that. How long do you think we should wai
HI,
> I will have this thread open for 4 hours.
Due to time zones and that some people may asleep right now I'd suggest we
leave it open for longer than 4 hours.
Justin
Hmm. I just noticed that the Git flex-sdk is just trunk and no branches.
Same for Git flex-tlf. Just its trunk and no branches.
Is that expected and how do we move the branches?
Otherwise, a unix diff matched for tlf. TLF has almost no history since it
was donated from Adobe w/o history (was i
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> A unix diff of the git repo vs an svn export turns up a lot of missing
> empty
> folders. I think that's ok. If it breaks a script somewhere it will be
> easy to fix.
>
> Git log of UIComponent.as shows the same history as SVN does.
>
> I thi
A unix diff of the git repo vs an svn export turns up a lot of missing empty
folders. I think that's ok. If it breaks a script somewhere it will be
easy to fix.
Git log of UIComponent.as shows the same history as SVN does.
I think SDK is good to go. I will take a look at TLF now.
On 3/15/13
I got a successful build from the git SDK (after applying the Justin
style workaround for the TLF issue).
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm downloading flex-sdk now. Geez, it is soo much faster than SVN.
>
>
> On 3/15/13 12:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>> The TLF repo
I'm downloading flex-sdk now. Geez, it is soo much faster than SVN.
On 3/15/13 12:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
> The TLF repo is up as well here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not
> the same repo as the earlier one)
>
> Same 4 hour window for testing and rep
My command line SVN is too new a format (it claims) for Apache SVN and
my GUI client thinks it needs to download a million and a half entries
before it can tell me anything. So, no way to answer your question on
my end.
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Om wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I see history back to Feb. 1st 2012, is that expected? On the SDK, that
> is...
>
> EdB
>
>
How far does the history in SVN go back?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > I'm cloning right now (88% done), will t
I see history back to Feb. 1st 2012, is that expected? On the SDK, that is...
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'm cloning right now (88% done), will try to build right after and
> look at what I can look at (and know about) while doing all this...
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On
I'm cloning right now (88% done), will try to build right after and
look at what I can look at (and know about) while doing all this...
EdB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Om wrote:
> The TLF repo is up as well here:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not
>
The TLF repo is up as well here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git (again, this is not
the same repo as the earlier one)
Same 4 hour window for testing and reporting issues.
Those who are testing or plan to test, can you please let me know right
away?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Mar 1
David@Infra says:
[~bigosmallm]
flex-sdk is up here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk.git
Please review and let me know.
Everyone, please review the new git repo and let me know if you see any
issues. Moreover, even though the url repo
26 matches
Mail list logo
