On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I found that the map data in [1] was organized by states enough to copy
> portions of it and replace the map data. I pushed new packages.
>
Thanks for patiently going through that file!
>
> So, other than one more change to the List class
I found that the map data in [1] was organized by states enough to copy
portions of it and replace the map data. I pushed new packages.
So, other than one more change to the List class that Peter is looking
into, I think we are good to open the discuss thread early next week, but
it sure would ma
I’ve pushed new packages that have ‘Generated by Apache Flex
Cross-Compiler’ in the comments. The build script further adds ASF
headers to those files. I’ve updated the images with the old Adobe FX
logo and replaced the support map. I think the only outstanding item is
the map coordinates licens
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/8/15, 3:17 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> Again, I could certainly be wrong, but my understanding of the rules is
> >> that an Apache p
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/8/15, 3:17 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> Again, I could certainly be wrong, but my understanding of the rules is
> >> that an Apache p
On 9/8/15, 3:17 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Again, I could certainly be wrong, but my understanding of the rules is
>> that an Apache project can’t publish a file of coordinates that isn’t an
>> exact c
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Again, I could certainly be wrong, but my understanding of the rules is
> that an Apache project can’t publish a file of coordinates that isn’t an
> exact copy of the original .svg file if the file is CC-BY-SA.
>
> My understanding is that any m
Again, I could certainly be wrong, but my understanding of the rules is
that an Apache project can’t publish a file of coordinates that isn’t an
exact copy of the original .svg file if the file is CC-BY-SA.
My understanding is that any modifications cannot be placed under AL (or
into the public do
There is also this demo app where we can get the co-ordinates from:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/robflaherty/us-map-raphael/master/us-map-svg.js
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:07 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/8/15, 11:58 AM, "
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/8/15, 11:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> wrote:
> >Sorry, I forgot to respond to your question. The co-ordinates for the US
> >States map comes from:
> >https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blank_US_M
On 9/8/15, 11:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Sorry, I forgot to respond to your question. The co-ordinates for the US
>States map comes from:
>https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blank_US_Map.svg
>
>which is under a dual license of Creative Commons - Att
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, I pushed new packages that deal with most of these issues (comments
> in-line). I’m still waiting to hear what others think we should do about
> headers for the generated files (see ‘Headers in Generated JS files'
> thread). And I’d like
OK, I pushed new packages that deal with most of these issues (comments
in-line). I’m still waiting to hear what others think we should do about
headers for the generated files (see ‘Headers in Generated JS files'
thread). And I’d like to replace the map image in FlexJSStore so I’m
looking for an
On 9/5/15, 12:47 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>This topic did make we wonder if we should add a line to each generated
>> file with something like:
>>
>> “Generated by Apache Flex FalconJX Compiler”
>
>IMO probably best to ask on legal discuss? The answer is unclear to me.
So I did ask on Lega
On 9/4/15, 9:13 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>Or this file - seems to be a phone coverage map?
>./images/support_map.png
This came from Adobe. I think I will just replace it. But that brings up
another question:
Om, for the US map coordinates, where did they come from and under what
license
Hi,
> I suspect none of those are sources if the source package didn’t show any Rat
> issues.
There a couple of minor issues great reported in the source but nothing IMO
worth worrying about. With the binary the noise marks it hard to check
everything.
I do find it a little odd that this JS s
On 9/5/15, 12:47 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> Yes, AFAICT. Rat should have picked up missing headers from the
>>sources.
>
>It does in the binary "963 Unknown Licenses” :-(
I suspect none of those are sources if the source package didn’t show any
Rat issues. I would also suspect runn
HI,
> Yes, AFAICT. Rat should have picked up missing headers from the sources.
It does in the binary "963 Unknown Licenses” :-(
> This topic did make we wonder if we should add a line to each generated
> file with something like:
>
> “Generated by Apache Flex FalconJX Compiler”
IMO probably b
On 9/4/15, 11:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Where is the javadoc exception described?
>
>No where I can find but the rat tool states:
>"JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
>Generated files do not required license headers”
>
>So I guess that means no header either
Hi,
> Where is the javadoc exception described?
No where I can find but the rat tool states:
"JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
Generated files do not required license headers”
So I guess that means no header either for these generated files. Do the files
they are genera
On 9/4/15, 10:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Everything in js/out folders are generated. Do they need headers or
>>some
>> other marking?
>
>I would assume so, but haven’t seen it stated anywhere to do so or not do
>so. However only exceptions I know of are javadocs and files without
Hi,
> Everything in js/out folders are generated. Do they need headers or some
> other marking?
I would assume so, but haven’t seen it stated anywhere to do so or not do so.
However only exceptions I know of are javadocs and files without creativity.
[1] The advice is if in doubt add one.
Tha
Awesome! Thanks for digging through it. One question (see below)
On 9/4/15, 9:13 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>For Flex JS binary release:
>- As for the source release above
>- There’s a large number of JS source files without Apache headers e.g.
>frameworks/projects/Binding/js/out/org/apache/f
Hi,
Just gave it a go and took a quick look at the release artefacts.
I notice the installer is asking to accept the Apache Flex JS and SWF Object
licenses, this isn’t required as they are permissive licensed software.
For Falcon JS source release:
- The product name is possibly incorrect in th
Execute bits are correct!
- Josh
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, I pushed a new nightly. Give it a try and see if your execute bits
> are correct.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/4/15, 10:48 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
> >Fix committed. You're good to go!
> >
> >- Josh
> >
> >On F
OK, I pushed a new nightly. Give it a try and see if your execute bits
are correct.
-Alex
On 9/4/15, 10:48 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Fix committed. You're good to go!
>
>- Josh
>
>On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Yep. I think there is an issue with Ant copying files a
Fix committed. You're good to go!
- Josh
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yep. I think there is an issue with Ant copying files and losing
> permissions so you have to set permissions after copy.
>
> Thanks for figuring it out. I’ve got a few more changes for the next
> ni
Yep. I think there is an issue with Ant copying files and losing
permissions so you have to set permissions after copy.
Thanks for figuring it out. I’ve got a few more changes for the next
nightly. I’ll wait for your fix before packaging it.
-Alex
On 9/4/15, 10:29 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
Ha! The solution always comes right after you send the email. I see in
installer.xml, that there's a mac-chmod target, and that includes compc,
mxmlc, and jsc from js/bin, but not the others. I'll get it fixed there!
Sorry for the noise!
- Josh
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Josh Tynjala wrote
I just installed the nightly. For some reason, compcjsc, externc, and
jquery in js/bin still don't have proper execute bits. I thought I had
gotten that all sorted out a couple of weeks back, but I must have missed
something. compc, mxmlc, and jsc all have the proper permissions.
In my local copy
OK, the nightly builds have been updated. Please try the build scripts.
If you already have the flex-asjs repo, make sure you have the
pre-requisites described here [1] then pull the latest changes and run
‘ant all’.
If you don’t have the repos and have installed the flexjs nightly, also
make sur
an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: OmPrakash Muppirala
Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 3:55 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.5.0
In your original email, you said
Install the nightly, then run ‘ant’ from
> >>there and
In your original email, you said
Install the nightly, then run ‘ant’ from
> >>there and see if it works for you.
Did you mean download the nightly? Or install it via the Installer?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Peter and I are almost done tuning the examples
Peter and I are almost done tuning the examples. I will try to update the
nightly tonight and send another notice when that’s ready. Then it would
be great if folks can try it out, especially the two new build scripts
that grab the dependent repos and build them.
I still haven’t renamed jsc.*, d
I just updated the version number to 0.5.0. Hopefully I didn’t miss any
places. Give it a try and let us know if you find a problem.
-Alex
On 8/24/15, 12:41 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>OK, I’ve updated the nightly build so that it matches the updates I just
>made to this wiki page [1]
>
>The clo
35 matches
Mail list logo
