the Mavenizer. After that I'll spin a
>Flexmojos release and then we'll come back to FlexUnit.
>
>Chris
>
>
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2015 17:49
>An: dev@flex.ap
s.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2015 17:49
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
I could be wrong but I suspect the core of flexunit doesn't have sdk
dependencies. The CI functions can run without a gui.
>Correct. The FlexUnit core is just AS but
I could be wrong but I suspect the core of flexunit doesn't have sdk
dependencies. The CI functions can run without a gui.
>Correct. The FlexUnit core is just AS but there are hooks for the GUI. Its
>honestly something I wanted to refactor more. Right now it's possible to build
>a version with
-- Original message--
From: Christofer Dutz
Date: Fri, Apr 3, 2015 5:59 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:AW: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Hmmm, but this way an old SDK won‘t be able to recieve updates to the unit-test
framework.
I think we shouldn't put everything in the sdk and g
> During a normal release ... where would you download the source package? From
> the jenkins workspace? If yes, I could setup such a job.
Correct. For the SDK there is a 'nightly' build during dev and a
'release' build on Jenkins during the RC period (after LAST CALL) that
contains both the sour
re.nl]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2015 07:57
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Cc: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
> These kinds of verify errors indicate mixing different swc versions. All
> swcs going into a swf must be on the same sdk version otherwise you risk
&
> Or better yet... why don't we make FlexUnit part of the SDK?
+1 - it feels like it would make projects more likely to have unit
tests, and it would hopefully make contributions to FlexUnit more
likely.
>> These kinds of verify errors indicate mixing different swc versions. All
>> swcs going into a swf must be on the same sdk version otherwise you risk
>> verify errors.
>
> Does that mean that we ideally should release different FlexUnit
> 'versions' to match each Apache Flex SDK version? At le
> These kinds of verify errors indicate mixing different swc versions. All
> swcs going into a swf must be on the same sdk version otherwise you risk
> verify errors.
Does that mean that we ideally should release different FlexUnit
'versions' to match each Apache Flex SDK version? At least for
We just want to see the source package before you start a vote on it.
Thanks
Alex
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Christofer Dutz
Date: Thu, Apr 2, 2015 12:46 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
The sta
4 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:RE: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Hi,
Except the site [1] was extremely slow at me this morning at 9 am GMT +0, I've
been able to run all my tests with this new FU version from IntelliJ.
Out of the IDE, my build system for this app is done with R
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2015 13:11
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
There were different compilations of FlexUnit available in the earlier days ...
perhaps to avoid that error?
There were different compilations of FlexUnit available in the earlier days ...
perhaps to avoid that error?
Chris
Von: Frédéric THOMAS
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2015 13:05
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Btw
Btw, now I'm thinking a little bit more about it, I think I used FU 4.1 with my
last 4.6 project because of the same issue and used the 4.2 for apache SDKs.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: AW: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
he 4.6
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: AW: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 10:18:19 +
>
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> well I think FlexUnit is compiled with Flex 4.12 (At least I think this is
>
I would assume you let it run with
4.6, am I correct? Did we change anything signifficantly?
Chris
Von: Frédéric THOMAS
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2015 10:53
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: RE: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Hi,
Except the site [1
ugh, did I miss
something ?
Note: I didn't test with flexcover.
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1010/
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
> Date: Thu
endet: Donnerstag, 2. April 2015 00:22
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Hi,
> Ok so I staged the Maven output at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1010/
Is there a source package there? I couldn't find one to review.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Ok so I staged the Maven output at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1010/
Is there a source package there? I couldn't find one to review.
Thanks,
Justin
Flexunit).
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. April 2015 13:25
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Ok so I staged the Maven output at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1010/
So feel
eed to re-invent the wheel for every Ant module.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. April 2015 09:18
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Hi Alex,
I didn't explicitly set one up, but I could do that. All I
eploys the Maven artifacts to the
snapshot repo.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. April 2015 06:33
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [LAST CALL] FlexUnit 4.3
Hi Chris,
Is there a nightly build we can examine? Or maybe put something out
Hi Chris,
Is there a nightly build we can examine? Or maybe put something out on
staging but don’t call a vote. The idea is that we’re supposed to iron
out the issues before cutting an official RC.
Also, how do we use/test the code?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 3/30/15, 6:08 AM, "Mihai Chira" wrote:
>H
Hi Chris,
I'm very much looking forward to this. Then we'll be able to get our
test runner to use this version[1], which should finally get
FLEX_34625_Tests to pass.
[1] http://s.apache.org/GKN
On 30 March 2015 at 13:22, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am preparing to start a new releas
Hi,
I am preparing to start a new release of FlexUnit. Even if only a hand-full of
bugs were fixed, this time I am intending on also releasing the Maven artifacts
for FlexUnit so I think it's worth a 4.3 :-)
Eventually (depending on the german wether during the Easter public holidays)
I'm pl
25 matches
Mail list logo
