On 4/17/15, 4:57 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>You're correct Alex, rbls were a full SDK OR user library. You could say
>we
>developed that global container to make plug and play with IntelliJ
>instant. Two years, my brain is a bit hazy.
>
>My design decision was, the SWC compiler did a job, w
You're correct Alex, rbls were a full SDK OR user library. You could say we
developed that global container to make plug and play with IntelliJ
instant. Two years, my brain is a bit hazy.
My design decision was, the SWC compiler did a job, we had other compilers
that did other jobs. For myself it
Mike, Fred,
I spent more time looking at the RBL code from Randori. It could be that
I haven’t fully understood the code, but it appears so far that RBL are a
higher-level container of things, and I’m currently thinking I can do
everything I need in a SWC.
Do you guys remember what the advantage
