You’re right. My test was not done well.
So it should probably be:
>> return intVal === numVal ? intVal : null;
On May 18, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Andy Dufilie wrote:
> (5.3 as int) is null, and "var x:int = null;" becomes zero.
>
> Sent from my Android
> On May 18, 2016 6:54 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
(5.3 as int) is null, and "var x:int = null;" becomes zero.
Sent from my Android
On May 18, 2016 6:54 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
> It seems like it’s 0.
>
> Either way, simply changing it to Number does not seem like a good
> solution.
>
> We probably need to do something like this:
>
> function asInt(v
It seems like it’s 0.
Either way, simply changing it to Number does not seem like a good solution.
We probably need to do something like this:
function asInt(value){
var intVal:int = int(value);//this should call parseInt()
var numVal:Number = parseFloat(value)
return intVal == numVal ? in
On May 18, 2016 2:50 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
> Isn’t this a behavior change?
>
> What happens if you do "5.3 as int” in ActionScript? Don’t you get 5?
>
I just tested this and got null.
Isn’t this a behavior change?
What happens if you do "5.3 as int” in ActionScript? Don’t you get 5?
On May 16, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/16, 9:47 AM, "Andy Dufilie" wrote:
>
>> There is no "int" type in JavaScript, so I think the compiler should just
>> replace int w
Here’s the output of parseInt with different arguments:
parseInt({foo:0},10));//NaN
parseInt(10.7,10);10
parseInt("10.7",10);10
parseInt("7",10);//7
So, we should probably do something like:
var val:Number = parseInt(value,10);
return isNaN(val) ? 0 : val;
What about uint? Something lik
It seems like we should continue to have the compiler call Language._int()
and fix the implementation. Right now _int() just does this:
static public function _int(value:Number):Number
{
return value >> 0;
}
Which I think is an attempt to truncate the Number. D
If you use 10 as the radix, you're fine. The strange behavior is when you
omit the radix because some browsers try to be smart and detect things like
a leading 0 as an octal number.
- Josh
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> I think parseInt() in JS has really odd behaviour
As long as you use radix, I know of no issues.
How does ">> 0” work? I don’t think I’ve come across that before.
On May 17, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> I think parseInt() in JS has really odd behaviour and is best avoided.
>
> Tom
>
> On 17 May 2016 07:46:07 BST, Alex Harui wr
I think parseInt() in JS has really odd behaviour and is best avoided.
Tom
On 17 May 2016 07:46:07 BST, Alex Harui wrote:
>I pushed changes for just the "x as int" case.
>
>On 5/16/16, 12:30 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>>I assume int() will cross-compile to parseInt()?
>
>Currently the compiler calls
I pushed changes for just the "x as int" case.
On 5/16/16, 12:30 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I assume int() will cross-compile to parseInt()?
Currently the compiler calls Language._int(), but the code in there
doesn't call parseInt. Should it?
-Alex
I assume int() will cross-compile to parseInt()?
On May 16, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/16, 9:47 AM, "Andy Dufilie" wrote:
>
>> There is no "int" type in JavaScript, so I think the compiler should just
>> replace int with Number.
>
> I agree. I will look into it.
>
>
On 5/16/16, 9:47 AM, "Andy Dufilie" wrote:
>There is no "int" type in JavaScript, so I think the compiler should just
>replace int with Number.
I agree. I will look into it.
-Alex
There is no "int" type in JavaScript, so I think the compiler should just
replace int with Number.
In general I would not recommend using "as Number" or "as int" anyway,
since it returns null if the value is of a different type, and null cast to
Number or int becomes zero rather than NaN.
On Mon,
The new sortOn code is causing a compile error in Language.as:
Language.js:408: WARNING - variable int is undeclared
[java] opt2 = org.apache.flex.utils.Language.as(opt, int);
I can easily fix this by changing opt2 = opt as int; to opt2 = int(opt); but I
think this is a bug in the “as” i
15 matches
Mail list logo
