On 3/11/13 8:27 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> The last entry for each descriptor is a 'null' and is supposed to be
> for "children", but as all child nodes in FlexJS seem to be
> implemented as 'beads', isn't the children entry obsolete?
No, there are certainly children or will be when we have
The last entry for each descriptor is a 'null' and is supposed to be
for "children", but as all child nodes in FlexJS seem to be
implemented as 'beads', isn't the children entry obsolete?
There is some inconsistency with regard to the final 3 (or 4, counting
'children') entries. The description on
On 3/11/13 4:18 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Could you please take a look at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/MXML+Data+Spec
>
> and check if that spec is still up to date? I see some differences
> between the spec and the current FlexJS output and I'm wonderi
Alex,
Could you please take a look at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/MXML+Data+Spec
and check if that spec is still up to date? I see some differences
between the spec and the current FlexJS output and I'm wondering which
one is leading...
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Ja
