On 7/8/16, 3:33 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>sorry If I sound like ANT was to be erradicated...not at all, but I'd love
>to see maven get rid of ANT hacks (if this is possible)
I think we did get rid of Ant dependencies in the Maven build. You just
got the
Hi Alex,
I think I generate a bit of confussion re-reading what I wrote. I
understand that ANT build continue to be there and maintained. I'm
referring only to maven build, that should not be dependant of ANT hacks
(at least in the end goal). So people could choose to build with ANT or
Maven (and
Hi Carlos,
I didn't understand this at all. I guess I just don't understand why we
have to have one way to build things. It doesn't seem like the Apache Way
to say "no, you can't have an Ant build".
I just want to get the Maven stuff to the minimum releasable state,
release it, get folks to try
Right now I have to cry a little ...
I'll respond tomorrow ;-)
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Carlos Rovira
Datum: 07.07.16 20:41 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Producing distributions with
Hi,
I think people of TI enviroments would want a tech like this that rely on
maven, but thinking on what people expect to have on his own CI process, we
need to be pure maven (without ANT hacks that would make this not valid).
So my vote is to rely only on maven, since if not it will defeats the
The key thing we need to decide here is whether folks who want to develop
using IDEs will need to run a Maven or Ant before importing the projects
into the IDEs and that the IDEs will properly handle regeneration of the
config files. The IDEs currently use config files checked into the repo,
inste
Hi,
I just added a new module to the flex-asjs module called "distribution". This
is a maven module that uses the maven-assembly-plugin to produce bundles of
software. I am currently trying to make it automatically build installable
versions of the SDK [1]. It would be cool if you could have a
