ager.valuesImpl will still be static as it is today. Any
>objections?
>
>
>
>From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>
>Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:07 PM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>
>Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Extending SimpleCSSValue
.
ValuesManager.valuesImpl will still be static as it is today. Any objections?
From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:07 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Extending SimpleCSSValuesImpl
On 10/30
On 10/30/16, 4:23 AM, "yishayw" wrote:
>Is there a reason why SimpleCSSValuesImpl.perInstanceStyles is static? It
>makes extending SimpleCSSValuesImpl difficult. Since there's typically
>just
>one such instance per app is there any harm in making it a dynamic
>property.
>That will allow derived
upon construction,
and make adding a new style property to an app easier.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Extending-SimpleCSSValuesImpl-tp56105.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
