Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

OK, good to know it works for other people. I've been trying to adjust the build scripts to create this package automatically. The current problem I'm wrestling with is in the Flash Builder launch configs. The launch configs are used by Flash Builder to update a new Flex project with a valid Fle

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

after removing that line, everything is fine. Thanks -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases Alex, Tried this package with VCode but getting the attached errror with no code intelligence <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Ft1149%2FCapture2.png&a

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Alex, Tried this package with VCode but getting the attached errror with no code intelligence -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Thanks Alex, That was informative and enlightening. I had no idea the SWF output was that valuable overall for testing. I would not push for pixel-perfect representation; there are certain browser quirks and differences that are just not going to be worth it. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Ale

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Hi Adam, Thanks for your input. Many of us want to make sure SWF output is viable for several reasons 3 of which quickly come to mind: 1) There is a runtime verifier in the Flash Player. When you run your code in Flash/AIR it is literally running 1000's of tests that the browser doesn't run and

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

This sounds great! In our use cases, we don't have a need for SWF output when doing FlexJS projects, and we suspect that we are not alone. For those that want JS and SWF output, what is the appeal or need? The existing Apache Flex compiler (with AIR if needed for mobile) works fine for our curren

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

>If this sound good to folks.. This sounds really good, Alex!! I think it's an important thing to get rid of some dependencies and to ease the FlexJS setup. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Thanks, I will report back when I have some spare time. Mike On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Unzip > In FB, go to Preferences/Flash Builder/Installed Flex SDKs > Hit Add... > > I would not make this folder the default SDK. For some existing FlexJS > project, go to Project/P

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Unzip In FB, go to Preferences/Flash Builder/Installed Flex SDKs Hit Add... I would not make this folder the default SDK. For some existing FlexJS project, go to Project/Properties/Flex Compiler and choose this new SDK. Note that Project/Clean does not clean up the "bin" folder so you may want to

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Alex, Being completely out of the loop, what do I have to do to use this zip content on Windows with FB? (quick and dirty bullet list?) Mike On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Here's a zip: http://home.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/ > ApacheFlexJSJSOnly.zip > > I only tried on Ma

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Here's a zip: http://home.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/ApacheFlexJSJSOnly.zip I only tried on Mac. I didn't realize we had an NPM package that overlaid AIR/Flash into an SDK folder. I agree that would be better than Ant. What I would really like to see, but not sure if it is possible, is to have

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > If I could get a zip to just try it, I am all for this. > > On the plus side, if you can get a zip only for windows and documented > setup for quick testing, I think this goes a long way with being able to > develop the compiler and develo

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

If I could get a zip to just try it, I am all for this. On the plus side, if you can get a zip only for windows and documented setup for quick testing, I think this goes a long way with being able to develop the compiler and develop the ui framework separation a lot cleaner. Getting stuff ripped

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Hi Alex, Since you fake airglobal.swc and playerglobal.swc maybe it will also work with Moonshine. I will try to do same operation as you did and see whether I will not have previous errors. Thanks! Piotr 2017-09-07 18:43 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > This is a big big deal. Thanks for get

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

This is a big big deal. Thanks for getting this done. I would be very interested in the non-installer, simple zip file download. I dont care much for Ant as a requirement, I would rather continue maintaining the npm FlexJS package for AIR download + setup. Thoughts? Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 7,

[FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

Hi folks, Yesterday, I was able to manually create a folder of files that contained no Adobe AIR or Adobe Flash files and still was an acceptable Flex/FlexJS SDK for Adobe Flash Builder and allowed me to compile DataBindingExample for JSFlex output only (it did not build a SWF). This is interesti