That's no problem at all, I didn't know about the .classpath, I
actually was trying NOT to submit that as I figured it only contained
local project settings.
Thank you.
EdB
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Cyrill Zadra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> On the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> Whatever need to be don to make things consistent, as I have said before,
> I'm more of a developer with the code and not to good with all these build
> details.
Just updated the .classpath file so they should work now all the same
or at
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> On the 'missing commons-io.jar in compiler.jx': since the project is
> dependent on the 'main' compiler, and the build for that downloads
> that jar, I figured we'd use that instead of having our build download
> it again. But you're right,
Quoting Cyrill Zadra :
Hi Mike
Just updated the build.xml and download ant for compiler.jx and
compiler.jx.tests. I had to add a @Ignore annotation on TestWalkerBase
& TestBase so junit doesn't try to execute a test method. It's now
also possible to run the unit tests with ant.
Ah, this suck
Cyrill,
Nice catch on the 'missing junit-4.10.jar in compiler.jx.tests' and
thanks for adding the build and download files.
On the 'missing commons-io.jar in compiler.jx': since the project is
dependent on the 'main' compiler, and the build for that downloads
that jar, I figured we'd use that ins
Hi Mike
Just updated the build.xml and download ant for compiler.jx and
compiler.jx.tests. I had to add a @Ignore annotation on TestWalkerBase
& TestBase so junit doesn't try to execute a test method. It's now
also possible to run the unit tests with ant.
I also recognized that eclipse cleanup al
Yeah, feel free.
I think those got over looked but are required for now.
We also need to think about sharing the EnvProperties utility. I have
made a copy of it in the compiler.jx.tests project.
If you have any questions feel free to ask.
Mike
Quoting Cyrill Zadra :
Nice work.. thank yo
Nice work.. thank you two!!! Just downloaded trunk and there are
missing jar's in my workspace.
missing commons-io.jar in compiler.jx
missing junit-4.10.jar in compiler.jx.tests
If don't mind I can update the build.xml & and download.xml for those
two projects.
Cyrill
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:
You're a brave person ;-)
First, read (most of) this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+%28asjs%29
It will show you what we're up to.
Next, get the 'falcon/trunk' source from SVN and have a (cursory) look
around. Don't let it scare you!
If you're still up for it, ping bac
On 16 January 2013 23:44, Michael A. Labriola
wrote:
> >I consider this a large victory for Apache Flex, that proves it doesn't
> take an enterprise to get things done, this was just 2 developers over the
> span of a month or so. I spent 3 months >studying the Falcon code though
> and have over 2
How can those who are just getting started play with this?
Also do you need help writing performance benchmarks or the like?
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Absolutely! :-)
>
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 12:44 AM, Michael A.
Absolutely! :-)
On Jan 17, 2013, at 12:44 AM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
>> I consider this a large victory for Apache Flex, that proves it doesn't take
>> an enterprise to get things done, this was just 2 developers over the span
>> of a month or so. I spent 3 months >studying the Falcon code
sage-
From: Michael A. Labriola [mailto:labri...@digitalprimates.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:45 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [FalconJx] New home for the new JavaScript cross-compiler
I consider this a large victory for Apache Flex, that proves it
doesn't take an enter
net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:45 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [FalconJx] New home for the new JavaScript cross-compiler
>I consider this a large victory for Apache Flex, that proves it doesn't take
>an enterprise to get things done, this was just 2 developers over the sp
>I consider this a large victory for Apache Flex, that proves it doesn't take
>an enterprise to get things done, this was just 2 developers over the span of
>a month or so. I spent 3 months >studying the Falcon code though and have over
>2 years with parsers and AST but still...
You two rock.
No harm done, all is well and as midnight approaches, I'm signing off
for today ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> Erik,
>
> Scratch what I said about the jars, my svn was playing tricks on my eyes. I
> just looked on the server and there is no lib folder in eit
> Erik, I just noticed there are 2 jars that got moved, the closure compiler
> jar and another one from the lib directory. Did you accidentally commit
> those? We have to delete those out of the repo quick.
Don't see them, and I think I'm being careful enough after all my
mistakes with SVN lately.
Erik,
Scratch what I said about the jars, my svn was playing tricks on my
eyes. I just looked on the server and there is no lib folder in either
of the projects.
Sorry about that mix up, you committed right when I was moving them. :)
Mike
Quoting Michael Schmalle :
Hi,
Well I managed
Hi,
Well I managed to move the compiler.jx and compiler.jx.tests project
into the trunk of falcon so we have a new javascript cross compiler
that is "as" functional as FalconJS is.
I still need to now look at Alex's MXML to port that into the compiler.
Erik, I just noticed there are 2 jar
19 matches
Mail list logo
