Hi Tom,
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Tom Brazil wrote:
> Rather amazing work. Good job.
>
thanks!
> However, what can be done about the massive difference in cpu utilization?
> The flash version used so little cpu that it wasn't noticeable, whereas
> the html5 version pegs a cpu at 40% min
PM
To: flex-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [FalconJx] AMD-based JavaScript code implemented in Jangaroo
Hi folks,
I have been rather quiet for a while, but that's because I have been busy
implementing JavaScript code generation according to the Runtime prototype I
posted some weeks ago.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> Yeah, thanks that makes the build process clear,
>
> What about the app development, debug from code to browser develop cycle?
>
> Like how do you envision the code being debugged, like how there is a
> Run/Debug and with breakpoints. This
Yeah, thanks that makes the build process clear,
What about the app development, debug from code to browser develop cycle?
Like how do you envision the code being debugged, like how there is a
Run/Debug and with breakpoints. This happens in the browser separate
of the IDE? I have IntelliJ Ul
Yeah, sounds great, we can start that way and get a quick lift-off, but in
the long term, I would certainly also like contribute code to FalconJx.
So as agreed above, I'll continue on "my" Wiki page.
Concerning the tool chain / IDE, here is how we work with ActionScript /
Jangaroo at CoreMedia:
Great!
Here is my thought Frank, I see no reason for you to even have to
write the AMD part. It dosn't make sense from a standpoint of time,
when I get some other things out of the way, if I have a good spec it
would take me less than a week with tests.
This will allow you to focus on ot
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Let me be direct, do you want to start working on AMD output?
>
Not necessarily right now. Still seems like a steep learning curve for me.
> IMO you should definitely finish up the Wiki stuff so it clear what needs
> to be do
Frank,
Let me be direct, do you want to start working on AMD output?
IMO you should definitely finish up the Wiki stuff so it clear what
needs to be done with AMD output.
Your MXML interpretation is the way I would see it as well. It's
crystallized until invoked. That is what I meant by in
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> I think what my plan is, is to tell you I'm not going to ignore you, I'm
> focused on MXML just so I can get it into the flow. After I get it
> committed I will try and see what is going on with the code you wrote.
>
Totally fine. While
Ok,
I read through everything. I'm a bit under the weather right now with
my head, my family laughs and says I should be relaxing, yeah spending
all day figuring out MXML emitter is my cold medicine. :)
I think what my plan is, is to tell you I'm not going to ignore you,
I'm focused on MX
Hi Michael, hi Erik,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> As Erik has said, he made a stub for this already and we can start
> writting it once I actually understand somethings.
>
> One thing I need to get clear, are you asking the output to be like
> Jangaroo where it prin
Quoting Frank Wienberg :
Hi folks,
I have been rather quiet for a while, but that's because I have been busy
implementing JavaScript code generation according to the Runtime prototype
I posted some weeks ago. However, I started off implementing this in the
Jangaroo compiler, not in Falcon. I a
> Falcon first. So of course now I hope that you guys help me porting this
> solution to FalconJx...
Frank,
I have created the preliminary implementation of an AMD emitter in FalconJx.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
I think you missed part of his long message… ;-)
> Another good news is that my employer signed the CCLA, and it has been
> confirmed by Craig, so now I am all set to contribute Jangaroo code to
> Apache Flex!
On Jan 20, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> I won't be able to loo
Hi Frank,
I won't be able to look at this for at least a couple of days.
BTW, how's it going with the ICLA/CCLA? Or did I miss seeing the
notification for it?
-Alex
On 1/19/13 1:08 PM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been rather quiet for a while, but that's because I have b
Hi folks,
I have been rather quiet for a while, but that's because I have been busy
implementing JavaScript code generation according to the Runtime prototype
I posted some weeks ago. However, I started off implementing this in the
Jangaroo compiler, not in Falcon. I am far quicker implementing th
16 matches
Mail list logo
