OK. Looks like that’s correct.
I just did a quick test:
function doSomething(in){
alert(in);
}
and Chrome flagged the function parameter as an unexpected token.
I was having a hard time figuring out what an “Identifier” in ECMAScript is,
but at the very least, Chrome considers it illegal. Tha
I'll double check the ECMAScript spec to see if reserved words are allowed
as function parameters. It's only in very specific places where they began
to be allowed in ES5. This may not be one of those places. If my memory
serves, I suspect it isn't one of those places, and Falcon is behaving
correc
We've recently made changes to allow keywords in more places. I
personally don't enjoy doing that work, but maybe Josh will.
-Alex
On 5/1/16, 12:34 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I get the same error for other reserved words:
>in,
>include,
>with,
>etc…
>
>On May 1, 2016, at 10:28 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>>
I get the same error for other reserved words:
in,
include,
with,
etc…
On May 1, 2016, at 10:28 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I manually deleted most of the core classes to get it to compile.
>
> I’m now getting an error which I don’t know if it’s valid or a bug in Falcon:
>
> public functi
I manually deleted most of the core classes to get it to compile.
I’m now getting an error which I don’t know if it’s valid or a bug in Falcon:
public function findKeyStrings(for:String):String{return null;}
public function translateKeyString(for:String):String{ret
Here’s my stab at producing ActionScript files from the OMV files:
https://github.com/unhurdle/omv2as
The output is actually pretty good. I get error-free output on InDesign files
with the exception of File types because I don’t yet have the core types
linked. Photoshop output is not as good, f
I was guessing that the release would probably work. I am concerned about
debugging though.
I will probably try this suggestion next week and see how far I can get without
further help. Chances are I’ll be back here before I’m successful though… ;-)
Thanks!
Harbs
On Apr 25, 2016, at 6:27 PM, A
On 4/25/16, 8:16 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>In the bin/js-release directory, all of the generated JavaScript is
>concatenated into a single file, so it no longer uses goog.require(). That
>should work in environments that cannot load multiple scripts.
I was about to suggest that as well. By d
In the bin/js-release directory, all of the generated JavaScript is
concatenated into a single file, so it no longer uses goog.require(). That
should work in environments that cannot load multiple scripts.
- Josh
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I would really like to use Falcon
I would really like to use FalconJX for ExtendScript development. ExtendScript
is Adobe’s flavor of Javascript used in their creative apps. They have an old
version of SpiderMonkey as the underlying engine (which still had E4X support).
I have some really complex scripts and currently the single
10 matches
Mail list logo
