).
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FALCON-Parity-with-MXMLC-tp29168p29509.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 04/09/2013 00:32, Carlos Rovira wrote:
to say that Repeaters are everywhere. So I'm afraid that Falcon will need
that things to make it production ready.
But all new builds would I hope be using a List with an item renderer
instead...
Tom
Yeah! Congratulations for reach this important milestone! :)
2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
> ...and its great to see a thread with this title, good job! :)
>
>
> 2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
>
> > Hi, in my personal opinion Repeaters support should be discontinued in
> > Falcon. It looks like an "i
...and its great to see a thread with this title, good job! :)
2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
> Hi, in my personal opinion Repeaters support should be discontinued in
> Falcon. It looks like an "intrusive" feature, don't know if it's worth the
> effort to implement it, its mantainance costs and the
Hi, in my personal opinion Repeaters support should be discontinued in
Falcon. It looks like an "intrusive" feature, don't know if it's worth the
effort to implement it, its mantainance costs and the related code
complexity growth (energy that could be put somewhere else).
And, old projects still
Hi Alex,
although I hate Repeaters and does not use it since many years ago, I must
to say that Repeaters are everywhere. So I'm afraid that Falcon will need
that things to make it production ready. If we want to be able to use it in
old projects...If the plan is only use it for new ones, I'm sure
In my tour through Falcon to get BasicTests to run, I saw there were
several things that MXMLC could do that were un-implemented. OTOH the
list was:
-Function data-binding
-XML data-binding
-Repeaters
There may be more. I got enough of function data-binding to work to get
BasicTests to run, but
