On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I checked in a bunch of fixes to Falcon to get a large 20MB SWF to compile
> and get to its first screen. I'm sure there are more bugs to fix if I used
> that SWF, but I'm going to stop there for a bit and work on other issues.
I can confirm
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33307
The test is currently @Ignore, but there are I think about 3 (types
of) errors when you run it. It is the only test blocking Falcon
compiling all the SDK SWCs. A couple of other tests generate warnings,
that are currently '-ignore-problem', that mig
It would be interesting to run the same test on machines with a different
number of processors. In theory, Falcon should outperform MXMLC as the
number of processors increase.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > No official measurements. How small are you talking a
Hi,
> No official measurements. How small are you talking about?
Was just wondering if the performance gain were hampered by disk access or
other bottle necks, a smaller project may give an more reasonable idea of the
typical performance gain in using Falcon. What exactly is a typical project
@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FALCON] Large App Compiles and Starts
Hi,
> The next milestone is to get the Flex SDK to compile with Falcon. Any bugs
> related to that would be good to work on.
This has been marked as done in JIRA - is there something that still needs to
be done?
Thanks,
Justin
No official measurements. How small are you talking about?
From: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 5:56 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FALCON] Large App Compiles and Starts
Hi,
> The Ant script t
Hi,
> The next milestone is to get the Flex SDK to compile with Falcon. Any bugs
> related to that would be good to work on.
This has been marked as done in JIRA - is there something that still needs to
be done?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> The Ant script that builds all of this code (several SWCs then one big SWF)
> takes about 4 minutes to run using MXMLC and 3.5 minutes with Falcon.
Do you have some ballpark performance gains re Falcon vs MXMLC and smaller swfs?
Thanks,
Justin
: [FALCON] Large App Compiles and Starts
Nice job Alex! Let me know if there is a bug you would like me to pick up
while you work on something else.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> Congratulatlons on reaching a huge milestone!
>
> - Gordon
>
> -O
Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:07 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [FALCON] Large App Compiles and Starts
>
> I checked in a bunch of fixes to Falcon to get a large 20MB SWF to compile
> and get to its first screen. I'm sure there are more
Congratulatlons on reaching a huge milestone!
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:07 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [FALCON] Large App Compiles and Starts
I checked in a bunch of fixes to Falcon to get a large
Nice job! I Look forward to start using it for my daily work.
2013/10/9 Alex Harui
> I checked in a bunch of fixes to Falcon to get a large 20MB SWF to compile
> and get to its first screen. I'm sure there are more bugs to fix if I used
> that SWF, but I'm going to stop there for a bit and wor
I checked in a bunch of fixes to Falcon to get a large 20MB SWF to compile and
get to its first screen. I'm sure there are more bugs to fix if I used that
SWF, but I'm going to stop there for a bit and work on other issues.
The Ant script that builds all of this code (several SWCs then one big
13 matches
Mail list logo
