[DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2016-06-05 Thread Alex Harui
Hi folks, Time for another board report (actually a little behind schedule since they want it by Wednesday). Please review and comment. Thanks, -Alex -- Apache Flex is an application framework for easily building Flash-based applications for mobile devices, the browser and deskt

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-07 Thread Harbs
To me it seems like excessive information to include that. On Jun 7, 2015, at 2:09 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 6/6/15, 11:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> It is in the report. What issues are still unresolved? >> >> The words Adobe legal wanted removed / changed in order t

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Hmm. Didn’t think it mattered to the board. I assume we’ll get it taken > care of before publishing. What do others think? My understanding is that branding, trademark and legal issues need be to mentioned in the board report [1], but it is up to you as the PMC chair if you think they

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/6/15, 11:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> It is in the report. What issues are still unresolved? > >The words Adobe legal wanted removed / changed in order to comply with >their trademark usage policy, see the last email from you in the >[RESULT][VOTE] thread. Hmm. Didn’t think i

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > It is in the report. What issues are still unresolved? The words Adobe legal wanted removed / changed in order to comply with their trademark usage policy, see the last email from you in the [RESULT][VOTE] thread. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/6/15, 9:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >>I thought we did resolve issues in Flex 4.14.1. We asked in the last >> report whether we had to go back and fix old releases. I didn’t see a >> response so I assume no. Do you want us to ask again? > >Perhaps legal@ is the best place to ask? Eith

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > So can I infer that you don’t have plans to write to them? I don’t want > to duplicate effort. I did intent to but have been busy with other stuff. Someone else mind doing it? > I thought we did resolve issues in Flex 4.14.1. We asked in the last > report whether we had to go back and fi

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-06 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/6/15, 4:05 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Did you write to the apacheflex.com owner? > >No I would of sent a draft to the list first before sending it. So can I infer that you don’t have plans to write to them? I don’t want to duplicate effort. >> What do you think we should say

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Did you write to the apacheflex.com owner? No I would of sent a draft to the list first before sending it. > My interpretation of Bertrand’s suggestion was that we’d report once someone > from the PMC tried > to contact them. Yep but either way it improtant to mention in the report espe

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Chris Martin
Ahh okay cool. Wasn't sure if it that was known. I did re-read my email afterwards and I didn't mean to make it sound that direct by saying “was actually mentioned”. I intended it to be more of an FYI than anything else. Just in case it was missed in the bustle 😉 Chris Sent from Surface

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/5/15, 9:34 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote: >Just wanted to bring this up, but this was actually mentioned back in the >September 2013 report [1]. Correct. My interpretation of recent advice was that someone from the PMC would write to the current owner then we would report on this issue. So I’

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Chris Martin
>We should also mention the current trademark issue with apacheflex.com Just wanted to bring this up, but this was actually mentioned back in the September 2013 report [1]. Here’s an excerpt: TRADEMARKS -It was discovered that an external entity was using the apacheflex.com to redirect to

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
You can get the template with basic statistics at reporter.apache.org (members only) WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Jun 6, 2015 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > On 6/5/15, 5:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > >We should also mention the current trademark issue with apachefle

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/5/15, 5:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >We should also mention the current trademark issue with apacheflex.com >and the licensing IP issues mentioned in the last board report has not >been fully resolved. Did you write to the apacheflex.com owner? My interpretation of Bertrand’s suggestio

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Code Donation Update > -Swiz donation is still pending. The donor has not filed the paperwork. > The main issue was collecting signatures from the many major > Contributors who have all moved on to new things. I think we can drop this from the report as it’s probably never likely to happe

[DRAFT] Apache Flex June 2015 Board Report

2015-06-05 Thread Alex Harui
Time for another report. Can someone provide latest analytics? Please review and comment, -Alex -- Apache Flex is an application framework for easily building Flash-based applications for mobile devices, the browser and desktop. RELEASES -Apache Flex SDK 4.14.1 was released on 3/30/15